Don’t let the door smack you on the way out!

The headline on Drudge pointed to a story by AP News.

Yesterday’s loss marks the beginning of a new chapter in her political career, she believes, almost certainly with closer ties to the Democrat Party.

The successful candidate will be responsible for overseeing wild horse protection and habitat conservation programs and will manage and expand relationships with the scientific community, government agencies, public officials and other allied organizations, according to an undated posting on the Conservation Job Board.

You must be a resident of Nevada.

The deadline is September 30.

Your new employer?

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses.

You’ll join others trying to change the way wild horses are managed, not the way their land is managed.

Figures like those above, which indicate a resource management problem not a wild horse problem, mean nothing because you’re driven by ideology not facts.

You view Cattoor, Uhalde and Sun J as competitors.

And your favorite words of encouragement are “A little to the left.”

There’s not one word about permitted grazing, which affects three of the four HMAs in the state, in this column posted yesterday by The Denver Post.

All of them are subject to the Montana Solution, or similar product, including the curated horse exhibit at Spring Creek Basin.

Three or four foals are born every year, down from 12 to 15 each year before the darting program was put in place, according to an article by The Journal of Cortez, CO.

The advocates refer to the practice as on-range management, but the goal in most cases is to take horses off the range.  Helicopters don’t fly but the results are the same.

Why don’t they talk about the way public lands are managed?

Spring Creek Basin is not subject to permitted grazing and the darting program has been in effect for 11 years.

RELATED: Spring Creek Herd to Die Off in Ten Years?

The discussion in this 19-minute audio segment goes off the rails in the second half when the advocate rambles on about drought, mineral extraction and climate change.

Instead of building on the dialogue of the first half, which focused on the way public lands are managed, she’s worried about saving the planet.

This is why our horses are in trouble.  Those who claim to be their voice are detached from reality and unmoored from the truth.  Men can be women and water flows uphill.

The data above, from the Warm Springs HMA in Oregon, identify the problem and explain why the wild horse and burro program operates like a pest control program.

RELATED: Draft EA for Fertility Control Research Out for Review.

The proposal has been in the news recently, including a report by ABC15 News, a podcast by NPR, an article by The Hill and a column in the Pagosa Daily Post.

Wild horses would be moved from areas where they’re not wanted (by public-lands ranchers) to remote wilderness areas not particularly suited to livestock grazing.

The plan was developed by a rancher.

How would it be put into practice?

They would be forced from their lawful home by helicopters, crammed into trailers and hauled to places nobody can access, where they would devour forage that propagates wildfires, supposedly.

How does that differ from what you see today at Piceance, Triple B and Twin Peaks?

The means by which they’d stop lightning, smokers and arsonists is a detail that hasn’t been worked out.

Boosting their appetite for conifers is another problem but they’re working on it.

Once the horses are gone, the ranchers will be able to enjoy everything their allotments have to offer, a goal they almost achieved in the “fast disappearing” days before the WHB Act.

RELATED: SHOCKER: Rancher Proposes Changes That Benefit Ranchers.

In 2018, vanadium was designated as a critical material by the U.S. government due to its importance to the defense and energy storage sectors, with no domestic production and all supplies imported, mostly from Russia, China and South Africa.

A vanadium shortage is expected by 2025, according to Nevada Vanadium, with the rising popularity of the vanadium redox flow battery, a mature technology that is scalable to hundreds of megawatt-hours of storage.

Battery life is projected to be at least 20 years with no degradation of the vanadium or charge density.

However, a story by NPR indicates there are few if any companies making the batteries in the U.S. and the top producer is in China.

The NVV flow diagram suggests the mine’s output is intended for batteries.

Why won’t the government license the technology to American manufacturers?

The metal will be pulled from American soil and processed with American resources.

As with the Keystone Pipeline, enriching our enemies seems to be a top priority of the one-horse pony and his illicit administration.

The Draft EIS for the Gibellini Mine only mentions vanadium redox flow batteries in Section 2.3, the Renewable Energy Alternative to the Proposed Action.

RELATED: Water for Vanadium Mine to Be Supplied by Fish Creek Ranch.

She’s been wandering the Currituck Outer Banks in search for companionship and has finally been accepted by another band, according to a story dated July 28 by The News & Observer of Raleigh, NC.

Alma joined up with Cowboy, a stallion, mares Daisy and Shala, and Shala’s 3-year-old son Renzi.

Apparently, the band does not include any foals.

Alma and Renzi may eventually split from the group and create their own family, a statement attributed to the Corolla Wild Horse Fund, like others in the article.

Western Horse Watchers decided to check it out.

An email sent to the herd manager asked if Alma had been treated with fertility control and what was the plan going forward.

As of this evening, no answer has been received.

Birth rates and breeding patterns are determined by the advocates, not the horses.

If Alma has been darted, the statement about starting a family was a lie.

A commenter on socialist media said “It’s hard to sit back sometimes and let nature take its course,” which is just about impossible wherever the advocates are involved.

Here are the headlines on Drudge.

The first link pointed to a story by the New York Post.

What’s next, tail gunners on bread trucks?

It’s tempting to blame the Biden voters, and they certainly bear great responsibility, but there weren’t enough of them to put the one-horse pony over the top.

RELATED: Inflation Gauges Don’t Consider Price of Hay?

The term does not appear in the news release issued earlier this week but that’s what it’s all about, according to a brief by Law Street Media.

A copy of the complaint was posted to Docket Alarm.

The Interior Board of Land Appeals has held that an HMAP is not a prerequisite to a wild horse roundup as long as the record indicates compliance with the WHB Act, as noted, for example, in Section 1.1 of the Final EA for livestock protection actions in the Bible Springs Complex.

If the BLM can show that the major components of an HMAP have been addressed, including the establishment of HMAs, AMLs and objectives for managing them, with ongoing monitoring and evaluation of whether those objectives are being met, the case will likely go down in flames and the advocates will not win the relief they seek.

A waste of time and money.  Exactly what you’d expect from the advocates.

RELATED: Advocates Take Legal Action to Stop Blue Wing Roundup.

Might be, according to a story posted this evening by the Steamboat Pilot & Today.

The advocates, with the assistance of BLM firefighters, are darting the mares with fertility control so the herds won’t bounce back.

Visitors will be eager to see these curated horse exhibits.

RELATED: Advocates Feign Concern for Piceance Wild Horses.

The move was applauded by the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, according to a story posted yesterday by Fox21 News of Colorado Springs, a group that views the contractors as competitors in the wild horse removal business.

In their quest to become the industry leader, legislative action that knocks the pilots and wranglers out of contention would be most welcome.

The article did not indicate if the amendment would ban the use of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft for catch-treat-release, which the advocates support.

RELATED: Move Over Cattoor, Advocates Want Larger Share of Market.

They claim that wild horses in Nevada are threatened by drilling and mining, and the loss of water associated therewith, according to a bulletin picked up by AP News.

Are they suggesting that those companies are draining ponds and creeks to supply their operations?  Or maybe they’re tapping into underground sources that will somehow deplete surface water needed by wildlife and the horses?

Sounds like rape and pillage.  How did that get through the NEPA process?

Where are the environmental impact statements and findings of no significant impacts that authorized the destruction?

As for the HMAPs, they must comply with land-use plans, as noted earlier this week.

If the plans allow water to be used for drilling and mining in HMAs, then so will the HMAPs.

If the plans assign most of the authorized forage to privately owned livestock, then so will the HMAPs.

If you disagree with that, the problem is not HMAPs or the absence thereof.

The problem is in the planning and decision documents that determine how the HMAs are managed.

The advocates don’t want you thinking about them because changes would actually help the horses and they prosper under the status quo.

Drilling and mining require anywhere from a few acres to a few thousand acres while pubic-lands ranching devours entire HMAs and beyond.  There’s no comparison.

RELATED: The Three R’s of HMAPs.

From Section 2.5.2 in H-4700-1, Wild Horses and Burros Management Handbook:

HMAPs tier to and must be in conformance with the applicable LUP.  If the proposed management strategy is not consistent with the LUP, then the LUP should be amended, or the proposal should be modified or rejected.

If the land-use plan assigns 86% of the authorized forage to privately owned livestock, do you think you can write a new HMAP that allocates 98% of the resource to wild horses, with 2% to wildlife, and put it into practice?

Pay no attention to the advocates, they are full of crap.

The problem is in the planning and decision documents that determine how HMAs are managed, as well as the statutes and regulations that precede them.

RELATED: The Three R’s of HMAPs.

1. Review the planning and decision documents that determine how the HMA is managed.

2. Ratify those provisions by copying them into the HMAP.  If the RMP assigns 86% of the authorized forage to privately owned livestock, then so shall the HMAP.  Describe how the horse population will be controlled to achieve the resource allocations on a continuing basis.

3. Reinforce the mismanagement of the HMA by putting the new HMAP out for public review, followed by minor revisions and approval.

RELATED: HMAPs Are Not the Answer.

Celeste Carlisle and Eric Thacker lead the Population Management Working Group.

Carlisle serves as Biologist and Science Program Manager for Return to Freedom.

Thacker, Rangeland Extension Specialist for Utah State University, explained his role in a lecture last December that was covered in this post.

Carlisle also leads the Outreach and Communication Working Group.

Collaboration with the FREES Network, a ranching advocacy group hosted by Utah State University Extension, further undermines the credibility of Return to Freedom, signatory to the ill-advised “Path Forward.”

RELATED: FREES Conference Announced.

Refer to this news release dated July 11.

They’d have to cure themselves of Trump derangement syndrome and put their January 6 show trial on the back burner.

The Wild Horse and Burro program would receive $156 million in FY 2023, according to the summary for Interior, Environment and Related Agencies, including $11 million for research on reversible immunocontraceptive fertility control and its administration.

How much of the funding will actually go to research, including the long-term effects of the Montana Solution?

The Pine Nut advocates did some unplanned bait trapping to remove a small tire caught on a mare’s leg, as explained in the July edition of Horse Tales by the real estate agent and PZP darter in the Minden/Gardnerville area.

The account begins on on page 16 and continues on page 19.

The listings are on page 24.

The incident could have been avoided by a more aggressive darting program that would take more horses off the range, leaving more food and water for the permittees (who are never mentioned in these stories).

APN 1322-00-002-041, a 161.8 acre parcel, has been marketed with an image of the animals she’s trying to eradicate.

Same for APN 1322-00-002-050, 80 acres.  No youngsters allowed.

As stated previously, the advocates have no scruples.

Support for the Pine Nut darting program comes in part from the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses.

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, No Major Side Effects Edition.

As the second half of the FY 2022 gather season ramps up, here are two provisions from the current statute to keep in mind as the action unfolds.

§1331. Wild free-roaming horses and burros shall be protected from capture, branding, harassment, or death; and to accomplish this they are to be considered in the area where presently found, as an integral part of the natural system of the public lands

§1332. “Range” means the amount of land necessary to sustain an existing herd or herds of wild free-roaming horses and burros, which does not exceed their known territorial limits, and which is devoted principally but not necessarily exclusively to their welfare in keeping with the multiple-use management concept for the public lands

The undefined concept of Appropriate Management Levels was not in the original statute, nor were there any provisions for privately owned livestock, yet today the land that remains is managed primarily for livestock and AMLs correspond to a tiny fraction of the available resources.

What you are seeing on the range could be described as lawlessness, yet the advocates are consumed with HMAPs, drilling and mining, and the Montana Solution.

So says Scott Wilson, who sits on the Board of the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, in a story about the Piceance roundup by The Colorado Sun.

What he didn’t say is that his group, a purveyor of the Montana Solution and a leader in the wild horse removal business, believes there shouldn’t be any foals or pregnant mares for helicopters to chase.

He’s in good company.  Most of the advocacy groups feel the same way.

RELATED: Piceance Roundup in the News.

The incident will begin on August 1 according to the latest schedule, increasing the FY 2022 capture target to 23,141, compared to 22,991 in the previous schedule.

The original goal, announced in January, was 22,000.

RELATED: Bible Springs Complex Added to Roundup Schedule.