Managing the HA as an HMA was one of the alternatives considered in the Red Desert Final EA but dropped from detailed analysis.
It’s unfit for wild horses but suitable for livestock, even though there’s considerable dietary overlap among the animals.
The HA lies mostly within the allotment.
The allotment master report puts it in the Improve category, with 47% of the permitted use in the suspended column.
Despite that, the allotment offers 15,077 active AUMs on 239,802 public acres, equivalent to 5.2 wild horses per thousand public acres.
That includes the area that can’t support any wild horses.
If conditions improved and the suspended AUMs moved back into the active column, the allotment would support livestock equivalent to 9.9 wild horses per thousand public acres—almost ten times higher than the target stocking rate across all HMAs of one wild horse per thousand public acres.
This is another example of double standard in resource management on America’s public lands.
Like the advocates, your faithful public servants aren’t playing for the home team.

Would the allotment make a good wild horse preserve?
It overlaps an area already identified for wild horses, which is a showstopper.
Numerous authorizations are attached, so you’d have to buy multiple base properties to access all of the AUMs.
Probably not a good investment.
The bureaucrats, who never have to face the voters, are trying to change the grazing rules to stop the conversion of allotments into wild animal preserves, not because it’s illegal but because the ranchers, especially the crybabies in Montana, don’t like the idea.
The proposal should not be taken as a barrier to your conservation project.
RELATED: BLM Issues Red Desert Final Planning Documents.

► Get the truth about wild horses and the wild horse advocates at westernhorsewatchers.com.














