The BLM’s April 18 news release said it would appear in the Federal Register in the coming days, but a search of that site for “Conservation and Landscape Health,” the subject of the unofficial prepublication version, yields no new results.
A search of Regulations dot gov for the same term also yields no new results.
The rule would put conservation on equal footing with other multiple uses of public lands, an attempt to amend FLPMA while bypassing the people’s representatives.

The principal or major uses of public lands are limited to domestic livestock grazing, fish and wildlife development and utilization, mineral exploration and production, rights-of-way, outdoor recreation and timber production according to the statute.
You know the rule is bad for the country and good for our enemies because it was promulgated by liberals.
In a similar way, you know an idea is bad for wild horses if the advocates promote it.

RELATED: Comment Period Extended for Proposed Public Lands Rule.
