The leader in the wild horse removal business—next to the federal contractors—has joined forces with the Animal Welfare Institute and two other advocates in opposing the Rock Springs RMP Amendments announced on May 6, according to their news release.

The complaint, submitted on June 6, the final day of the protest period, criticizes the plan which will reduce the wild horse population by sixty to seventy percent, exactly what Plaintiff #1 is doing on the Virginia Range!

A keyword search of the document yielded 58 instances of “PZP.”

As predicted, these steadfast opponents of helicopter roundups now support them because they are part of the catch-treat-release protocols solicited by the BLM last month for delivery of the pesticide!  Refer to paragraph VI.A.1.b.

They have no convictions.

Nothing gets better for the horses until these frauds are out of the picture.

RELATED: Minor Problem with Rock Springs RMP Amendments?

The headline could read Advocates Shocked by Loss of 145 Wild Horses at Canon City?

No difference.

The commie-pinko-fags in the Democrat Party, who are now trying to diminish your ability to keep and bear arms, and defend yourself from tyrants like them, don’t give a crap about children any more than the wild horse advocates give a crap about foals.

Both groups are frauds, with many members in common.

Don’t worry though, if you like your darting rifle you can keep your darting rifle.

RELATED: Uvalde Aftermath: Abortion Still #1 Killer of Children.

Note the excitement of these hikers as they come across a foal on the Appalachian Trail.

A window into the dark and wicked souls of the wild horse advocates.

RELATED: Will Virginia Range Volunteers Be Elevated to Sainthood?

Misleading reports about the loss of 145 wild horses are still rolling out, including this one by KVVU News in Las Vegas.

Why weren’t the horses on their home range?

Off-range corrals are not the problem, they are a symptom of the problem.

Curiously, the charlatans interviewed for these stories use the case to advance their own anti-horse agenda.

RELATED: Advocates Seek End of Roundups in Wake of Cañon City Incident.

Here are the headlines on Drudge.  He’s not managing problems, he’s causing them.

His voters deserve to be rooked but not the rest of us.

Two sentences from a story by the Las Vegas Review-Journal will suffice.

“An advocacy group for wild horses is seeking an emergency halt of roundups on public lands following recent assessments of understaffing and animal welfare risks at federal corrals and holding centers in Nevada and other Western states.”

“The American Wild Horse Campaign, as well as lawmakers led by Titus and Cohen, want federal agencies to implement birth control measures to reduce the need for the helicopter roundups.”

There’s nothing to see here, folks.

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses wants roundups replaced with darting programs.  They want the horses off the range as much as the bureaucrats and ranchers.

They’d be agitating for that even if there were no deaths at the off-range corrals.

Their long-term goal is to be the leader in the wild horse removal business.

So long, Cattoor and Sun J.

RELATED: Bold Prediction for Incident at Cañon City.

This story by ABC Fox Montana in Missoula speaks volumes about the way the media react to events involving wild horses.

Who will get rid of them?

Apparently, they didn’t think about calling the advocates.

You have to.  Taking them off the range with the Montana Solution would be much more difficult sitting down.

On the other hand, in view of the extended timeframe to achieve the desired results, as opposed to the cruel and inhumane helicopter roundups, you’ll definitely want to bring a lawn chair with your darting gear.

Would the one-horse pony travel to Texas if the victims were white?

As expected, liberals are using the incident to further their political agenda, which has always included the separation of you from your guns, as seen today on Drudge.

They want you subjugated to an all-powerful centralized government, the antithesis of the American founding.  And they’re willing to destroy the economy and your standard of living to achieve it.

If you won’t go along with their plan they’ll call you a racist, homophobe, misogynist or other pejorative.  That’s how they get their commie-pinko-fag candidates into office.

You fall for the ploy because you do not know Truth.

Pay no attention to their propaganda and never give up your guns.

Normally the process is reserved for the deceased but in darting circles their accomplishments are unprecedented.

• Nancy Killian
• Steve Paige
• Tamera Gertdz
• Elena Sullivan

Each has delivered over one thousand doses of PZP to mustangs on the Virginia Range, according to the author of “Wild Horse Tales” in the May edition of Horse Tales.

As a result, injuries are easier to find than youngsters.

RELATED: Montana Solution Harmless Because Advocates Said So.

The mask is off.  The article titled “Wild Horse Tales” in the May edition of Horse Tales reveals their glorious plan, starting on page six.

No sensible person can look at what they’re doing to the horses and call it protection.

• Promotion of overpopulation narrative
• Silence about permitted grazing
• Acceptance of rangeland mismanagement
• Collaboration with bureaucrats and ranchers
• Silence about resource availability and apportionment
• Obsession with Montana Solution
• Dismissal of principles in original statute

If you think these people are protecting wild horses then you probably think the Uvalde shooter was protecting kids.

Don’t forget your “Stay Wild” cap.

RELATED: Older Horses Should Be Allowed to Die Where Born.

As for the youngsters, they shouldn’t be allowed at all.

The real estate agent and PZP darter in Minden/Gardnerville area is back with another column about the Montana Solution in this month’s edition of Horse Tales.

A perfect topic for Foal-Free Friday, starting on page six.

This charlatan praises the work of the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses and Wild Horse Eradication, who spend your hard-earned donations on useless endeavors.

She points to the 60,000 animals in off-range holding, and the associated costs, but does not say a word about the cattle and sheep occupying their home range.

A few miles to the north, the advocate identifies four others who have fired over one thousand doses each of PZP into the Virginia Range herd.

She’s proud of their accomplishments.

The article concludes with some remarks about roundups—that don’t work according to the monster-in-charge at CAAWH.

They are very effective, you idiot, at shifting resources from wild horses to privately owned livestock, the same thing you and your foot soldiers are trying to achieve with the Montana Solution.

The herds will never bounce back if they have their way, assuring ranching superiority in areas set aside for the horses.

These people are lowbrows, stooges for the public-lands ranchers.

Q. Why are you always cracking on the advocates?

A. Because they’re wrong.

Q. Isn’t that a bit divisive?

A. I don’t care what they think, I am a voice for the horses.

Q. What don’t they like about Western Horse Watchers?

A. The numbers—the truth is in the numbers and they are innumerate.

Q. What’s missing from the wild horse world?

A. The technical side—the data, the calculations, the comparisons.

Q. Why is that important?

A. The American people don’t realize how far we’ve strayed from the original statute.

Q. Why aren’t you on socialist media?

A. You can say whatever you want as long as it conforms to leftist ideology.

Q. What’s wrong with that?

A. Seriously?

Refer to the commentary dated May 24 in the Reno Gazette Journal, written by a volunteer who filmed the colt with the broken leg on Day 1 of the roundup.

The incident prompted the introduction of HR 6635, the helicopter ban, that would not affect the driver of wild horse removals, only the way they are carried out.

The road to improvement starts with Herd Management Area Plans, according to the writer.

“The effect of not having these plans is these outrageous and large helicopter roundups.”

Wrong.

The Draft EA for resource enforcement actions in the Bible Springs Complex indicates in Section 1.1 that HMAPs are not prerequisites to the BLM taking horses off the range.

On-site observation of wild horse roundups, discussed in the column, documents the problem but does not point to solutions.

Injuries, deaths and subsequent mistreatment of these animals, including the incident at Cañon City and the fallout from the adoption incentive program, are too late, too far downstream in the management process, yet they receive most of the attention.

Areas identified for wild horses are managed primarily—if not principally—for privately owned cattle and sheep.

The off-the-range philosophy of the wild horse and burro program follows naturally.

This explains why roundups, fertility control, sterilization, sex-ratio skewing, adoptions, training and warehousing of captured animals devour most of its budget.

It’s a pest control program, designed to minimize its impact on the grazing program.

Would HMAPs change any of that?

Of course not.

The EA suggests that HMAPs establish AMLs and objectives for managing the HMAs, consistent with pre-existing management plans and other decision documents, monitor conditions and evaluate whether management objectives are being met, and provide corrective actions if the goals are not being achieved.

Put simply, they ratify and reinforce the status quo!

What are the results where they’ve been applied?

• Paisley Desert HMA – Livestock receive 85% of authorized forage
• Frisco HMA – Livestock receive 80% of authorized forage
• Sulphur HMA – Livestock receive 77% of authorized forage

Livestock receive 88% of the authorized forage at the North Lander Complex, to be affirmed by an HMAP.

Livestock receive 89% of the authorized forage at the Warm Springs HMA in Oregon, to be locked in by an HMAP.

At Little Colorado HMA in Wyoming, livestock receive 97% of the authorized forage, awaiting ratification by an HMAP.

The writer’s thesis is off the mark.  The folks at Wild Horse Education, widely regarded as experts in the field, should know that.

RELATED: HMAPs Are Not the Answer.

Those who are so concerned about saving wild horses from slaughter would be first in line to get rid of them with the Montana Solution.

Ever notice that?

Don’t forget your “Stay Wild” cap.

RELATED: International Fertility Control Conference Next Week.

If every mare in a herd produced a foal, you’d see birth rates approaching, possibly exceeding, 50% per year.

Mares tend to outnumber stallions on the range, indicated by data from roundups.

A 45/55 split between males and females would not be unusual.

The Montana Solution magnifies the disparity, even taking it outside the range of expected variation from a random process.

Foals typically represent fifteen to twenty percent of the horses captured in a roundup.

Not all mares want to be bred, at least in your host’s experience.

They resist the stallion’s advances.

You may have heard about horses taking their riders under trees to knock them off.

Same thing happens at the ranch.  The mare, untreated, goes straight for the barn when the colt, uncut, tries to mount her, knocking him off.  This has been going on for several weeks, complete with dust and flying gravel.

This suggests that there may be other ways of letting the horses manage themselves on the range, without the interference of humans.  They may know more about appropriate herd sizes, genetic diversity and the risks of inbreeding than we think.

“Dart them anyway, it’s good for business.”

The duly elected sodomite and enemy of marriage, family and traditional values—but praised by the advocates because he’ll push for infertility of wild horses—told the Acting Director of the BLM in the state that the roundup should be delayed until any influx of new horses will not face the same kind of outbreak that occurred at Cañon City, as explained in a story posted yesterday by Fox21 News of Colorado Springs.

The roundup is set for late August according to the latest schedule.

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, platinum sponsor of the International Conference on Fertility Control, knows how to stop it.

They are a voice for the public-lands ranchers.  Why are you still giving them money?

No more roundups, the group said today in a news release, until the BLM can ensure the animals’ health and safety off the range.

Then it’s okay to let the helicopters fly?

Western Horse Watchers says no more roundups until lands designated in 1971 are managed principally for wild horses and burros, as specified in the original statute, and the True AMLs have been exceeded.

• Livestock confined to base properties
• Most resources assigned to horses and burros
• Small amount reserved for wildlife

The inquiry would likely focus on vaccines that prevent illness, not on vaccines that prevent life.

The announcement refers to First Gentleman Marlon Reis, who is the sodomite partner of the Governor of Colorado.

RELATED: Critics of Cañon City Incident Have Hidden Agenda.

The event is set for May 23 – 25 in Colorado Springs, CO.

The conference committee includes members from RTF and HSUS, signatories to the rancher-friendly “Path Forward.”

Look at the sponsors: BLM, HSUS, CAAWH, AWI, SCC, ASPCA, RTF.

The opening plenary features remarks about wild equid fertility control and stakeholder engagement by the Assistant Director of Resources and Planning at the BLM.

The agenda includes a session on Day 2 regarding the treatment of burros with PZP, probably on the Black Mountain HMA (now subject to a roundup).

The conference promises to create an environment that is inclusive, welcoming, supportive, collaborative and productive for all participants, and will cater to a community known for its moral depravity.

The Governor of Colorado, a filthy sodomite, will speak to the group on May 23.

RELATED: Science-Based Management (of Wild Horses) Explained.