How Many Wild Horses Can the Dishpan Butte HMA Support?

For a quick estimate, convert the livestock AUMs to wild horses and add the result to the AML.

The HMA intersects two grazing allotments according to Table 2 of the Draft EA for resource enforcement actions in the North Lander Complex.

The HMA boundary coincides roughly with the boundaries of the Dishpan Butte and Big Pasture allotments, as shown in the Western Watersheds map.  Long Creek Pasture is not included.

Dishpan Butte HMA Map with Allotments 01-26-22

The 100 horses allowed by plan require 1,200 AUMs per year.  The HMA covers 99,736 total acres, including 92,373 BLM (public) acres.

The eight permittees receive a total of 13,597 AUMs per year according to Table 2.

The Allotment Master Report indicates a forage allocation of 13,892 AUMs per year across the two allotments.  Both are in the Improve category and contain a total of 92,371 public acres.

The forage assigned to livestock, based on data in the EA, would support an additional 13,597 ÷ 12 = 1,133 wild horses, for a True AML of 100 + 1,133 = 1,233.  This is the number of animals the HMA could support if it was managed principally for wild horses, as specified in the original statute.

The current population of 270 is well within this range, so there are no excess horses in the HMA and there is no need for a roundup or fertility control program.

The 1,133 horses displaced from the HMA by permitted grazing represent 2.3% of the 50,000 animals in off-range holding.

The current AML corresponds to about 8% of the total authorized forage, neglecting wildlife, meaning the HMA is managed principally for livestock.

Forage availability in this area is very high, about 160 AUMs per year per thousand acres, which would support a stocking rate of 13 wild horses per thousand acres!

The target rate across all HMAs is one wild horse per thousand acres.

AMLs and stocking rates are low relative to the available resources because the bureaucrats put ranching interests far above those of the horses.

The advocates would have you believe that Herd Management Area Plans (HMAPs) are the answer to wild horse mismanagement, but until the Resource Management Plans are changed, they can only prolong it.

Confine the ranchers to their base properties, including those who secure grazing preference with water rights, and let them pay market rates to feed their animals.

RELATED: Preliminary EA for North Lander Complex Out for Public Review?

FY 2022 Resource Enforcement Goals in the News

This report by AP News has already been picked up by some news outlets and will likely spread to others in the next few hours.

How can the BLM say, for example, that the Muskrat Basin HMA is overpopulated with 952 wild horses, when it authorizes privately owned livestock equivalent to 1,992 wild horses in the same area, on top of the 250 horses allowed by plan?

RELATED: FY 2022 Resource Enforcement Actions Announced.

Pancake Roundup Day 14

The incident began on January 11.  Gather stats through January 24:

  • Target: Horses
  • Type: Planned
  • Method: Helicopter
  • Captured: 982, up from 852 on Day 10
  • Average daily take: 70.1
  • Capture goal: 2,060
  • Removal goal: 2,030
  • Returned: 4, no change from Day 10
  • Deaths: 11, up from 10 on Day 10
  • Shipped: 917, up from 797 on Day 10

Helicopters did not fly on Day 11 due to poor weather.

One horse was put down on Day 12.  The death rate is 1.1%.

The cumulative total includes 409 stallions, 444 mares and 129 foals.

Youngsters represented 13.1% of the horses captured, consistent with a herd growth rate of 8% per year, assuming a 5% death rate.

Of the adults, 47.9% were stallions and 52.1% were mares.

Body condition scores were not reported.

The location of the trap site within the Complex was not provided.

Pancake Complex Map 01-07-22

Day 14 ended with 50 unaccounted-for animals.

The number of horses removed to date is 978.  Mares returned to the Complex will be treated with fertility control of unspecified type.

Other statistics:

  • AML: 638 (across two HMAs, one WHT and one HA)
  • Forage assigned to horses: 7,656 AUMs per year
  • Pre-gather population: 3,244
  • Forage liberated to date: 11,736 AUMs per year
  • Water liberated to date: 9,780 gallons per day
  • Forage assigned to livestock: 43,344 AUMs per year (estimated)
  • Horses displaced from Complex by permitted grazing: 3,612
  • True AML: 4,250
  • Stocking rate at new AML: 3.5 wild horses per thousand acres
  • Horses displaced from Complex by drilling and mining: Ask the advocates

RELATED: Pancake Roundup Day 10.

Sulphur Resource Enforcement Plan Approved, First Awareness

The decision was announced yesterday.  The Decision Record, Final EA and other supporting documents can be accessed at the project page in ePlanning.

Western Horse Watchers was unable to find any notifications at the BLM news site and does not know how and when public involvement was solicited for the scoping phase of the project or the release of the draft EA.

A notice appeared at ePlanning on May 6, 2020 according to the Decision Record.

The Proposed Action, discussed in Section 2.2 of the EA, targets wild horses over a ten-year period and features the removal of excess animals to the low end of the AML as quickly as possible through one or more roundups, population suppression using PZP-22 and equipping the remnant with GPS tracking devices for research purposes.

The HMA covers 265,675 acres in western Utah and the 250 horses allowed by plan consume 3,000 AUMs per year.  The stocking rate allowed by plan is 0.9 wild horses per thousand acres, in line with the target rate across all HMAs of one wild horse per thousand acres.

Sulphur HMA Map 01-25-22

The HMA intersects nine grazing allotments, according to Table 3.1 of the EA, and livestock receive an estimated 10,256 AUMs per year therein, assuming the resource is evenly distributed across the allotments.

The forage assigned to livestock would support an additional 854 wild horses, for a True AML of 1,104, the number of animals the HMA could support if it was managed principally for wild horses as specified in the original statute.

The current population of 497 is well within that range.

The 854 horses displaced from the HMA by permitted grazing represent about 1.7% of the 50,000 animals in off-range holding.

The stocking rate at the new AML would be 4.2 horses per thousand acres, or 238 acres per horse.

Although livestock receive 3.4 times more forage than the horses, and the AML corresponds to just 22.6% of the authorized AUMs (neglecting wildlife), the HMA does have a Herd Management Area Plan (HMAP), according to Section 1.3 of the EA.

The new resource enforcement plan, which will help the ranchers access all of the AUMs on their permits, is subject to a 30-day appeal period.

Curiously, a roundup appears on the latest schedule with a start date of February 8.

RELATED: HMAPs Are Not the Answer.

How Many Wild Horses Can the Muskrat Basin HMA Support?

For a quick estimate, convert the livestock AUMs to wild horses and add the result to the AML.

The HMA intersects two grazing allotments according to Table 2 of the Draft EA for resource enforcement actions in the North Lander Complex.

The HMA boundary coincides roughly with the boundaries of the Muskrat Open and Granite Mountain Open allotments, as shown in the Western Watersheds map.

Muskrat Basin HMA Map with Allotments 01-24-22

The 250 horses allowed by plan consume 3,000 AUMs per year.  The HMA covers 193,255 total acres, including 176,227 BLM (public) acres.

The eight permittees receive a total of 23,906 AUMs per year according to Table 2.

The Allotment Master Report indicates a forage allocation of 23,103 AUMs per year across the two allotments.  Both are in the Improve category and contain a total of 176,988 public acres.

The forage assigned to livestock, based on data in the EA, would support an additional 23,906 ÷ 12 = 1,992 wild horses, for a True AML of 250 + 1,992 = 2,242.  This is the number of animals the HMA could support if it was managed principally for wild horses, as specified in the original statute.

The current population of 952 is well within this range, so there are no excess horses in the HMA and there is no need for a roundup or a fertility control program.

The 1,992 horses displaced from the HMA by permitted grazing represent 4.0% of the 50,000 animals in off-range holding.

The current AML corresponds to about 11% of the total authorized forage, neglecting wildlife, meaning the HMA is managed primarily for livestock.

Forage availability in this area is very high, about 152 AUMs per year per thousand acres, which would support a stocking rate of almost 13 wild horses per thousand acres!

For reference, the Virginia Range was carrying ten wild horses per thousand acres before the advocates got involved.

The target rate across all HMAs is one wild horse per thousand acres.

AMLs and stocking rates are small relative to the available resources because the bureaucrats put ranching interests far above those of the horses.

RELATED: Preliminary EA for North Lander Complex Out for Public Review?

How Many Wild Horses Can the Rock Creek HMA Support?

For a quick estimate, convert the forage assigned to livestock (AUMs) to wild horses and add the result to the AML.

Table 2 of the Draft EA for resource enforcement in the North Lander Complex indicates the HMA intersects one grazing allotment.

The HMA boundary coincides roughly with the boundary of the Rim Pasture Allotment, as shown in the Western Watersheds map.  (Click on image to open in new tab.)

Rock Creek HMA Map with Allotment 01-22-22

The 86 horses allowed by plan consume 1,032 AUMs per year.  The HMA covers 24,584 total acres, including 19,085 BLM (public) acres.

The five permittees receive 3,976 AUMs per year according to Table 2.

The Allotment Master Report is not working today but the Allotment Information Report, also at RAS, indicates a forage allocation of 3,982 AUMs per year at Rim Pasture.  The allotment is in the Improve category according to the AIR and contains 19,100 public acres.

The forage assigned to livestock, based on data in the EA, would support an additional 3,976 ÷ 12 = 331 wild horses, for a True AML of 86 + 331 = 417.  This is the number of animals the HMA could support if it was managed principally for wild horses, as specified in the original statute.

The current population of 179 is well within this range, so there are no excess horses in the HMA and there is no need for a roundup or fertility control program.

The 331 horses displaced from the HMA by permitted grazing represent about 0.7% of the 50,000 animals in off-range holding.

The current AML corresponds to about 21% of the total authorized forage, neglecting wildlife, meaning the HMA is managed primarily for livestock.

Forage availability in this area is very high, 262 AUMs per year per thousand acres, which would support a stocking rate of almost 22 wild horses per thousand acres!

The target rate across all HMAs is one wild horse per thousand acres.

AMLs and stocking rates are low relative to the available resources because the bureaucrats put ranching interests far above those of the horses.

Would an HMAP fix that?  Nope.

RELATED: Preliminary EA for North Lander Complex Out for Public Review?

UPDATE: AMR has been fixed, report for Rim Pasture posted.

How Many Wild Horses Can the Conant Creek HMA Support?

The advocates will never ask that question.  The rationale for their darting programs would fall to the ground.  They don’t want you asking either.

Table 2 of the Draft EA for resource enforcement actions in the North Lander Complex indicates the HMA intersects one grazing allotment.

The HMA boundary coincides roughly with the boundary of the Conant Creek Common Allotment, as shown in the Western Watersheds map.

Conant Creek HMA Map with Allotment 01-22-22

For a quick estimate, convert the forage assigned to livestock (AUMs) to wild horses and add the result to the AML, which is currently 100.

The three permittees receive 7,832 AUMs per year according to Table 2 and 7,987 AUMs per year according to the Allotment Master Report.  Let’s use the figure in the EA.

The forage assigned to livestock would support an additional 7,832 ÷ 12 = 652 wild horses, for a True AML of 752.

The current population of 263 is well within this range, so there are no excess horses in the HMA and there is no need for a roundup or fertility control program.

The stocking rate at the new AML would be about 15 wild horses per thousand acres.

The 652 horses displaced from the HMA by privately owned livestock represent about 1.3% of the 50,000 animals in off-range holding.

The current AML corresponds to about 13% of the total authorized forage, neglecting wildlife, meaning the HMA is managed primarily for livestock.

RELATED: Preliminary EA for North Lander Complex Out for Public Review?

Desatoya Roundup Day 6

The incident began on January 16.  Gather stats through January 21:

  • Target: Horses
  • Type: Planned
  • Method: Helicopter
  • Captured: 147, up from 93 on Day 3
  • Average daily take: 24.5
  • Capture goal: 233
  • Removal goal: 150
  • Returned: 2, up from zero on Day 3
  • Deaths: 2, up from 1 on Day 3
  • Shipped: 83, up from 9 on Day 3

A stallion was euthanized on Day 5, lifting the death rate to 1.4%.

The cumulative total includes 67 stallions, 61 mares and 19 foals.

Youngsters represented 12.9% of the horses captured, consistent with a herd growth rate of 8% per year, assuming a 5% death rate.

Of the adults, 52.3% were stallions and 47.7% were mares.

Body condition scores were not reported.

The location of the trap site within the HMA was not provided.

Desatoya HMA Map 01-19-22

Two stallions, each blind in one eye, were returned to the HMA on Day 4.  Blindness is usually a fatal flaw for captured horses.

The number of animals shipped includes nine privately owned horses returned to their owner on Day 3.

Day 6 ended with 60 unaccounted-for animals.

Other statistics:

  • AML: 180
  • Forage assigned to horses: 2,160 AUMs per year
  • Pre-gather population: 277
  • Forage liberated to date: 1,740 AUMs per year
  • Water liberated to date: 1,450 gallons per day
  • Forage assigned to livestock: 9,608 AUMs per year (estimated)
  • Horses displaced from HMA by permitted grazing: 801
  • True AML: 981
  • Stocking rate at new AML: 6.1 wild horses per thousand acres
  • Horses displaced from HMA by drilling and mining: Ask the advocates

RELATED: Desatoya Roundup Day 3.

HMAPs Are Not the Answer

The statute, altered at the behest of ranching interests, protects wild horses and burros to some degree, but not their land.  It does not protect them from the advocates.

Roughly half of the land, if you include the proposed Rock Springs RMP Amendments, has been taken away and is now devoted almost exclusively to permitted grazing.

Areas with non-zero AMLs are managed primarily for livestock.

The resource management plans assign anywhere from 80% to 95% of the authorized forage to privately owned cattle and sheep.

The pest control programs follow naturally: Roundups, sterilizations, fertility control programs, sex ratio adjustments, adoption and training programs, off-range holding and sanctuaries.

Animals in off-range corrals (feedlots) are protected.

Animals in long-term holding are protected.  Most won’t be adopted.  They are sent there to die.

Animals in the adoption pipeline are protected, in theory, until they are titled.

If you only care about protection, you’re in good shape.

If you want to see them wild and free on their home range, and this does not include gradual extermination by the Montana Solution, as the advocates prefer, you have to focus on the RMPs and the bureaucrats who write them.

They never have to face you, the taxpayers and voters.

RELATED: Group Calls for End of Pancake Roundup, Demands Investigation.

Pancake Gather Plan

Pancake Roundup Day 10

The incident began on January 11.  Gather stats through January 20:

  • Target: Horses
  • Type: Planned
  • Method: Helicopter
  • Captured: 852, up from 713 on Day 7
  • Average daily take: 85.2
  • Capture goal: 2,060
  • Removal goal: 2,030
  • Returned: 4, no change from Day 7
  • Deaths: 10, up from 9 on Day 7
  • Shipped: 797, up from 588 on Day 7

One horse was euthanized on Day 8.  The death rate is 1.2%.

The cumulative total includes 357 stallions, 383 mares and 112 foals.

Youngsters represented 13.1% of the horses captured, consistent with a herd growth rate of 8% per year, assuming a 5% death rate.

Of the adults, 48.2% were stallions and 51.8% were mares.

Body condition scores were not reported.

The location of the trap site within the Complex was not provided.

Pancake Complex Map 01-07-22

Day 10 ended with 41 unaccounted-for animals.

The number of horses removed to date is 848.  Mares returned to the Complex will be treated with population suppression of unspecified type.

Other statistics:

  • AML: 638 (across two HMAs, one WHT and one HA)
  • Forage assigned to horses: 7,656 AUMs per year
  • Pre-gather population: 3,244
  • Forage liberated to date: 10,176 AUMs per year
  • Water liberated to date: 8,480 gallons per day
  • Forage assigned to livestock: 43,344 AUMs per year (estimated)
  • Horses displaced from Complex by permitted grazing: 3,612
  • True AML: 4,250
  • Stocking rate at new AML: 3.5 wild horses per thousand acres
  • Horses displaced from Complex by drilling and mining: Ask the advocates

RELATED: Pancake Roundup Day 7.

Group Calls for End of Pancake Roundup, Demands Investigation

The loss of a colt on Day 1 of the roundup sparked outrage among some advocates, according to a news release on EIN, but nobody’s asking why it’s occurring.

What about the foal that was put down on Day 4 of the Jackson Mountains roundup because it was an orphan?  Where’s the indignation?

Regarding HMAPs, if the resource management plan assigns 85% of the authorized forage to privately owned livestock, do you think you can write a new plan that assigns 98% of the resource to the horses with 2% to wildlife and make it stick?

Maybe they’re OK with the current allocations and just want to make sure the horses don’t suffer as they are enforced.

At least they didn’t use the death to justify a darting program for the Complex.

RELATED: Advocate Blames Roundups on Pipelines, Mines!

Preliminary EA for North Lander Complex Out for Public Review?

An announcement appeared yesterday on the BLM news site but now it’s gone.

The project can be accessed at ePlanning, which includes the news release.

The Proposed Action, discussed on page 9 of the EA (page 10 in the pdf), features helicopter roundups, sterilization of up to 95% of captured stallions and returning them to the Complex, IUDs for mares returned to the Complex, treatment of captured mares with GonaCon Equine including those receiving IUDs and skewing the sex ratios to 60% males and 40% females.

Four HMAs would be targeted over a ten-year period: Conant Creek, Rock Creek, Dishpan Butte and Muskrat Basin.  Data for the HMAs are presented in Figure 1.

North Lander Complex Map 01-21-22

The Western Watersheds map shows the project area.  All four HMAs are subject to permitted grazing.  Refer to data in Table 2 of the EA.

The news release described the combined AML as “the point at which the wild horse population is consistent with the land’s capacity to support it and other mandated uses of those lands,” code words for privately owned livestock, so the unstated purpose of the project is resource enforcement—get rid of the horses so the ranchers can access all of the AUMs on their permits.

Comments can be submitted online and will be accepted until February 18.

Changes to forage allocations in the Complex cannot be accomplished through a pest control program.  Don’t ask a highway patrol officer to change the speed limit.

The management plan must be amended, which is outside the scope of the project.

RELATED: Scoping for North Lander Gather Plan Begins.

UPDATE: January 20 news release restored.