Bypassing the American People

A story dated July 9 by Tri-State Livestock News describes the reaction of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association to an executive order committing $500 million to expanding processing capacity in the beef industry.

The order was intended to promote competition in the American economy and directs the USDA to consider issuing new rules defining the “Product of the USA” label on beef so consumers have accurate, transparent information at the grocery store.

The term ‘rulemaking’ appears 21 times in the order.

In Sec. 5. (i) (ii), the Secretary of Agriculture shall consider initiating a rulemaking to define the conditions under which the labeling of meat products can bear voluntary statements indicating that the product is of United States origin, such as “Product of USA,” to ensure that consumers have accurate, transparent labels that enable them to choose products made in the United States.

The issue is not the labels.  As an aside, do you think producers of range-fed beef would welcome labels like this?

RANGE FED

PRODUCED ON PUBLIC LANDS

Ensuring that consumers have accurate information is the last thing on their minds.

The concern is the rulemaking.  The new rules will be created by the unelected bureaucracy, not your elected representatives.

They may be tied to a statute, or have the appearance of such, but you have no voice in the process.

Look at the rules affecting wild horses and burros.  Do they uphold the statute—which was crafted by your representatives—or contradict it?

So much for consent of the governed.

Filling in the Gaps at Healthy Horse HMA

The fictitious HMA was the subject of a presentation last week about gather planning and scheduling in wild horse areas, according to the WHBAB agenda.

Characteristics from page 6 of the slide deck:

  • AML – 500
  • Size – 750,000 acres
  • Livestock grazing – Limited
  • Other issues – Frequent droughts and invasive weeds

The horses allowed by plan require 6,000 AUMs per year and the aimed-at stocking rate is approximately 0.7 horses per thousand acres.

The presentation did not provide any information about resources assigned to livestock and did not include an EA for enforcement actions associated therewith, so the meaning of ‘limited’ is not clear.

Western Horse Watchers has yet to see an HMA where, say, twenty to thirty percent of the authorized forage has been allocated to privately owned cattle and sheep, neglecting those areas where permitted grazing is not allowed.

We need a bridge that will take us from the horse side of the management plan to the ranching side and the chart in this post about stocking rates will do exactly that.

Start on the x-axis at 0.7, move vertically until reaching the dashed line, then go horizontally to the left until you hit the y-axis.  An estimated 85% of the forage has been assigned to other users of public lands (with a small amount reserved for wildlife, not considered in this post).

So, indeed, grazing is limited.  Healthy Horse HMA is managed primarily for livestock, not principally.  Areas no longer designated for wild horses, around half of the land identified in 1971, might be managed almost exclusively for livestock.

The total authorized forage is 6,000 ÷ .15 = 40,000 AUMs per year, with 34,000 AUMs per year dedicated to livestock.

The advocates, not mentioned in the presentation, are undeterred by these figures and continue to push their darting programs.  The voices of one or more celebrities may have been added to bolster the effort.

Occasionally, water may be scarce for the horses, but the ranchers have installed various improvements that insulate their herds from droughts, perhaps with the assistance of the federal government.  Every year, 50% of the grazing fees, or $10 million, whichever is greater, is plowed back into the program.

In recent years, the $10 million limit has prevailed, because the grazing fees, stuck in a time capsule since the 1960s, are artificially low.

The forage assigned to livestock would support an additional 2,833 wild horses, for a True AML of 3,333.

The stocking rate at the new AML would be approximately 4.4 horses per thousand acres, or if you prefer, about 227 acres per animal.

A larger horse population might do a better job of knocking down those invasive weeds.

The 2,833 horses displaced from the HMA by privately owned livestock represent 5.8% of the 48,897 horses currently in off-range holding, according to figures provided at the meeting.

Conversely, up to 5.8% of the horses in off-range holding could be returned to the range by ending public-lands ranching at Healthy Horse HMA, a savings of two to five million dollars per year.

The decrease in receipts from lost grazing fees would be $45,900 per year.

Most people would eagerly give up that income if they could save that much money.

The presentation said that a survey found 1,200 wild horses in the area, considerably less than 3,333, so there is no need for a roundup.  The problem is livestock, not horses.

RELATED: WHBAB Offers New Slate of Anti-Horse Recommendations.

Katie Heigl Duped by Advocates?

Refer to this news release, appearing today on EIN Presswire.

Although it addresses the misguided practice of PZP darting, it does not reflect the writer’s desire to see America’s wild horses moved to remote wilderness areas not particularly suited to livestock grazing, so the ranchers can have all of their food.

Eighty to ninety five percent is not enough.

RELATED: Onaqui Wild Horse Rally Today at Utah State Capital.

WHBAB Offers New Slate of Anti-Horse Recommendations

The Board met online June 30 and July 1.  Western Horse Watchers did not view any of the proceedings, including public comments.

The first recommendation, in view of the “unprecedented drought situation,” is to create “an emergency action plan including the capacity to gather and house an unprecedented number of equids, coincidentally contacting FEMA and Interior regarding possible funding, and issuing an emergency declaration.”

Getting rid of wild horses and burros has been the goal all along but the idea is easier to sell when you can point to a temporary change in their environment.

Never let a crisis go to waste.

RELATED: WHBAB Meets Next Month.

Pancake Gather Plan

Anti-Slaughter Amendment Clears U.S. House

The measure, part of the HR 3684 infrastructure bill, bans the transport of equines across state lines or to Canada or Mexico for slaughter for human consumption, according to a news release issued this morning by Animal Wellness Action.

The amendment carried with others by a voice vote, which may mean there’s no record of who voted for and against.  The announcement did not indicate if the animals could be transported for pet food and other products.

RELATED: Amendment Tries to End Horse Transport for Slaughter.

Who’s Tampering with AJR-5?

The resolution would urge the federal government—ooops, administration—to, among other things, establish management of these animals informed by independent science and the American public, and to restore a thriving ecological balance to California wild horse and burro areas and territories.

Although ‘independent science’ is suspect, the addition of ‘thriving ecological balance’ could be a big red flag.

If it means wild horses and burros living in balance with wildlife, as specified in the original statute, then fine.

If it reflects contemporary usage, where most of the resources on public lands have been diverted to privately owned livestock, then the measure is toast.

RELATED: AJR-5 Amended Again.

Thriving Ecological Balance-3

You Don’t Have a Horse Problem You Have a Ranching Problem

The 50,000 wild horses in off-range holding could be returned to the range by ending permitted grazing on just a few dozen HMAs.

That’s about one fifth of the HMAs and WHTs combined.

If the pattern holds in other wild horse areas, the total number of horses cheated out of a spot on their home range by privately owned livestock is well north of 200,000.

As bad as that is, the advocates want to get rid of even more with their ruinous darting programs.  Why are you still giving them money?

RELATED: Example of Downstream Focus, Confusing Cause and Effect.

Mid Year Status Report 06-09-21

The Advocates Should Join Forces with the Cattlemen

Both groups want the same thing: Wild horses off the range.

The advocates want to get rid of them with contraceptives, while the ranchers want them dispatched with helicopters, but those differences can be worked out later.

Collaboration could lead to a groundbreaking plan for eradicating most of America’s wild horses.

Oh wait.

RELATED: Wild Horse Management Needs to Change?

Example of Downstream Focus, Confusing Cause and Effect

An article about overpopulation by The Horse suggests that the current surplus of about 70,000 wild horses and burros (on public lands) could be eliminated if just four to five percent of horse-owning households adopted one animal.

The story did not indicate how many more households would be needed to liquidate the animals in off-range holding.

What’s wrong with this idea?

First, there are few if any excess animals on America’s public lands.  That’s bad news to those in the PZP supply chain.  They thrive on the overpopulation narrative.

Second, adoptions don’t stop removals, they prolong them.  The AIP, and the adverse consequences associated therewith, are effects of roundups, not causes of them.

Third, the ‘surplus’ would return, the roundups would resume and the corrals would be overflowing, not because the animals reproduce, but because of the way our public lands are managed.

AMLs, the numbers that determine when an area is overpopulated, are small because the bureaucrats have decided that most of the resources on lands set aside for horses and burros shall be assigned to privately owned cattle and sheep.

The True AMLs, numbers that represent the horses and burros allowed by plan plus the horses and burros displaced by livestock, are much higher, as anyone reading these pages knows.

The animals in off-range holding could be returned to the range by ending public-lands ranching on just a few dozen HMAs.

Those corrals and pastures could be emptied four to five times over if livestock grazing was ended on all HMAs.  It’s that bad.

Eventually the herds will exceed the True AMLs and corrective actions will be needed.

But those discussions are off the table until the HMAs are managed principally for wild horses and burros, which is what the True AMLs represent.

If you want to help America’s wild horses and burros, look upstream in the management process, understand why they’re being removed from the range and address those causes for a lasting solution.

AIP Fallout, Managing Humanely and Virginia Range Update

A 27-minute audio segment by KNPR Radio of Las Vegas features the director of the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, an organization that’s second only to the federal government in terms of eradicating wild horses.

You see, the number of wild horses in off-range holding could be sharply reduced, along with those shipped to slaughter, if we prevent their birth.

Resources set aside for the horses can be shifted to, well, you know, other users of public lands.

As for the Virginia Range, approximately 1,400 mares have been darted and, with the help of predators, zero population growth has almost been achieved.

Like the Salt River, these people are not just standing around while the herd dies off.

They are actively involved in its demise.

All because some bureaucrat said there should be no more than 600 wild horses, ideally just 300, on the Virginia Range.

RELATED: FOA Files Suit to Stop AIP.

Trajectory of Wildh Horse Fertility Control Program 04-11-21

BLM to Decimate Onaqui Herd, Advocates Say ‘Let Us Do That’

They’re opposed to helicopter roundups, as indicated in this June 18 news release by Animal Wellness Action, but won’t condemn the darting program.

True, the terms ‘humane management’ and ‘fertility control’ don’t appear in the announcement.

The problem is upstream in the management process, namely, the land-use plans that determine who gets what.

The rancher-friendly ‘Path Forward,’ which is mentioned in the announcement, will enforce resource allocations already on the books.

The darting program can only keep the scales tilted in favor of the ranchers.

RELATED: Rallying for Onaqui Wild Horses or Privately Owned Livestock?

Stakeholders Optimistic About ‘Ingenuity’ and ‘Perseverance’

“These vehicles hold great promise for minimizing wild horse herds,” said one of the ranchers who attended the conference with dozens of advocates.

“That prototype in New Mexico is already obsolete,” claimed another.

“One of the drawbacks of that contraption is that the horses have to come to it,’ noted one of the presenters, “but these things are mobile and can go on the offensive.”

Ingenuity and Perseverance 06-16-21

The rover and drone include a vast array of sensors, on-board ballistics computers and satellite positioning systems that assure pinpoint accuracy.

Darts are fired by linear motors that don’t use compressed gas or other propellants.

“These platforms will really put a dent in those herds,” whispered one of the advocates, “something we’ve dreamed of for a long time.”

Although the technology won’t be commercialized for several years, land managers are anxiously watching its development while researchers put the finishing touches on GonaQuine, a long-lasting treatment that isn’t classified as a sterilant.

RELATED: ‘Ingenuity’ Shows Off Advanced Darting Technology.