A Tale of Two Interests

Imagine a parking lot with room for 1,500 cars.

One day, when the lot contains almost 500 cars, the government says that it can only support 200.

“That’s strange,” you think to yourself, “I can see that the capacity is much larger than 200, they’re lying!”

The next day, the government announces a plan to remove the excess cars.  A towing company has been hired to do the job in five days.

When the story breaks, a parking-rights group argues that towing can be rough on cars, claiming that damage can be minimized if the cars are dismantled and carried out piece by piece.  The process will be slower but the results will be the same.

The group does not question the government’s assertion and does not oppose the removal, only the way it will be carried out.

The government is not convinced by their argument and while the tow trucks are working, opens the lot to 18-wheelers taking a break from the nearby interstate.

“That’s just wrong,” you say to yourself, “this lot was meant for cars, not big rigs.”

The parking-rights group protests the action, to no avail.

When it’s all said and done, only the truck drivers are smiling.

Tale of Two Interests-1

Onaqui Aftermath

A report by The Salt Lake Tribune says that 126 of the 433 horses shipped from the HMA will be returned, including mares treated with PZP.  The 307 remaining will be offered for adoption or placed into long-term holding.

An official acknowledged that most of the horses taken off the range exhibited fairly good body conditions, contrary to earlier reports that many were suffering from lack of water and forage due to overpopulation and drought.

RELATED: Onaqui Roundup Over.

Black Mountain Roundup, Part 2, Day 132

The operation began on March 9, a resource enforcement action that follows a wild burro removal in 2020Gather stats through July 18:

  • Burros captured: 303, up from 243 on Day 122
  • Capture goal: 500
  • Removal goal: Probably 500
  • Returned: 0
  • Deaths: 0
  • Shipped: 209, no change from Day 122

The cumulative total on the gather page is 306.

Foals represented 14.9% of the burros gathered.  Of the adults, 61.6% were male and 38.4% were female, not what you’d expect to find in a sample of n = 303 taken from a simple random process centered at 50% males / 50% females.

Do these results tell you anything useful about the herd at large?

There were 94 burros in the unaccounted-for category.

The incident is not open to public observation.

Supplemental statistics:

  • AML: 478
  • Pre-gather population: Unknown
  • Forage liberated to date: 1,818 AUMs per year
  • Water liberated to date: 1,515 gallons per day
  • Burros displaced from HMA by privately owned livestock: 1,222
  • True AML: 1,700
  • Excess animals before roundup: Unknown

RELATED: Black Mountain Roundup, Part 2, Day 122.

UPDATE: The limits of variation for males and females should be based on n = 258 adults, not n = 303.  The observed percentages are still outside the calculated limits with n = 258.  The formula for computing the limits can be found in this Wikipedia article.

Cibola-Trigo Roundup Over

Gather operations ended July 15 with 228 burros captured, 227 shipped and one death, according to figures at the gather page.

The goal was 200.

The gather page said 230 animals removed.

Foals represented 12.7% of the total.  Of the adults, 44.7% were male and 55.3% were female.  The number of unaccounted-for animals was zero.

The incident was not open to public observation.

RELATED: Cibola-Trigo Nuisance Roundup in Progress.

Onaqui Roundup Over

Gather operations ended today with 435 horses captured, one death and one returned, according to figures at the gather page.

The goal was 400.

Foals accounted for 10.8% of the total.  Of the adults, 47.9% were male and 52.1% were female.  The number of unaccounted-for animals was zero.

The incident liberated 5,208 AUMs per year for other mandated uses of public lands.

RELATED: Onaqui Roundup Day 4.

UPDATE: The AUMs liberated will be reduced by the horses returned to the HMA, including those treated with contraceptives.  The final figure may be closer to 4,000 AUMs per year, assuming 100 horses returned.

More AIP Fallout?

A rescue in West Fulton, NY has increased capacity to take in former wild horses that ended up in kill pens.  The woman running the operation pays 75 cents per pound to get them out and $1,000 or more to ship them home, according to a story posted yesterday by The Daily Gazette of Schenectady, NY.

She said that one of the mustangs brought in last year was supposed to be in long-term holding with the government paying a rancher for her care but she was handed off to kill buyers instead.

RELATED: Adoption Incentive Backfiring or Working Exactly as Planned?

Putting Price Tags on America’s Wild Horses and Burros

Comments on the 2018 EA for resource enforcement actions in the Onaqui Mountain HMA suggested that forage on public lands generates an economic benefit of about $100 per AUM per year.

If that’s true in other areas, a wild horse, who consumes 12 AUMs per year, represents an economic loss of $1,200 per year.

A wild burro, who devours six AUMs per year, represents a loss of $600 per year.

The AML for Twin Peaks HMA is 758 wild horses and 116 wild burros, for a total economic loss of $979,200 per year.

For simplicity, let’s assume the 27,000 animals allowed by plan on your public lands are horses only.  The economic loss is $32.4 million per year.

The current population of 95,000 represents a loss of $114 million per year.

As Archie D. Ryan of the DOI stated many years ago, “The wild horse consumes forage needed by domestic livestock.  They bring in no return and serve no useful purpose.”

RELATED: Value of Forage in HMAs?

Chincoteague Pony Auction Next Week

The herd will not be forced to swim across the channel this year but the mares and foals will be trailered to the carnival grounds after roundups and sorting on July 25 and 26, according to an announcement by the Chincoteague Volunteer Fire Company.

The foals will be auctioned and the mares returned to their home territory (Virginia side of Assateague Island).

The announcement did not say if any of the foals would rejoin the herd and provided no information on long-term trends in herd sizes, sex ratios and genetic diversity.

RELATED: Chincoteague Pony Swim Called Off Again.

Onaqui Roundup Day 4

The incident began on July 14.  Gather stats through July 17:

  • Horses captured: 344
  • Capture goal: 400
  • Removal goal: 296
  • Returned: 1
  • Deaths: 1
  • Shipped: 342

One death occurred on Day 3, related to the roundup.

Foals accounted for 10.2% of the horses gathered.  Of the adults, 48.9% were male and 51.1% were female.

There were no unaccounted-for horses.

Some of the mares will be treated with contraceptives and returned to the HMA along with some of the stallions.

Gather operations will likely conclude in another day or two.

Supplemental statistics:

  • AML: 210
  • Pre-gather population: 500
  • Forage liberated to date: 4,116 AUMs per year
  • Water liberated to date: 3,430 gallons per day
  • Horses displaced from HMA by livestock: 1,300 (estimated)
  • True AML: 1,510 (estimated)
  • Excess animals before roundup: None

RELATED: Onaqui Roundup Day 2.

How Many Cattle and Sheep Are on the Onaqui Mountain HMA?

That’s a hard question to answer, for the reason noted in this post, but the number of cattle and sheep in the Onaqui allotments is easy.

Go to the Authorization Use report in RAS.

  • State: Utah
  • Field office: Salt Lake
  • Allotments: Refer to Table 1 in the Onaqui Comment Report

Click Apply to run the report.  How do you know the field office?  Look at the news release for the roundup.

You can download the report by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right or you can view it here.

Western Horse Watchers recommends that you work with resource allocations, not the number of animals, to get the best understanding of the way our wild horses and burros are being managed.

RELATED: How Many Livestock Are on the Onaqui Mountain HMA?

Value of Forage in HMAs?

Refer to items [12], [13] and [14] of comment #1960 in the Onaqui Comment Report, starting at the bottom of page 136 in the pdf.

The 19,235 AUMs in the grazing permits provide roughly $1.9 million in benefits to local economies.  That’s about $100 per AUM per year in economic activity.

Now we can put a price tag on wild horses.

The Onaqui AML is not 210, but 210 × 12 × 100 = $252,000 per year in lost economic value.

The pre-gather population of 500 represents 500 × 12 × 100 = $600,000 per year in lost economic activity.

The answer is obvious: Remove the horses and give their food to the ranchers.

This is an area where the advocates can unite with the cattlemen in their desire to get rid of wild horses.

RELATED: Advocates Frustrated with Onaqui Roundup?

Advocates Frustrated with Onaqui Roundup?

Must be tough.  They’re watching a contractor get rid of the horses with helicopters when they could be doing the same with their darting rifles.

Most of them want the mares treated with PZP, a pesticide, to keep the herd in check without having to resort to sterilization or roundups, according to a report posted this morning by The Salt Lake Tribune.

Nobody’s talking about land-use plans, resource allocations and the reasons for wild horse removals.

Nobody except Western Horse Watchers.

RELATED: Status of Onaqui Allotments, Wild Wednesdays at Onaqui Mountain HMA.