Heber Wild Horses Use Water That ‘Other Animals’ Need?

An Arizona congressman believes that “some people are frustrated with the wild horses because they use the water tanks or use resources that other animals in the area also need,” according to a report posted this evening by AZFamily of Phoenix.

Who do you suppose that might that be?  Is he suggesting a culprit or motive?

RELATED: Residents Want Answers About Heber Wild Horse Shootings, Gossip About Motives in Heber Wild Horse Shootings?

PSA 12-15-19

BLM to Modernize Grazing Regulations on Public Lands

The project will streamline the grazing permit process and provide greater flexibility for land and resource management, according to a news release posted today.

Public comments can be submitted until February 28.  Project documentation can be found at this page.

As always, comments should be substantive.  For example, “The United States does not receive fair market value for forage consumed by domestic livestock on public lands, as required by FLPMA; the fee should be brought in line with market conditions.”

It’s one of the few things that hasn’t been touched by inflation.  If gasoline was priced like the grazing fee, you’d be paying about seventeen cents per gallon.

Be sure to compare the allotment map to the HMA map.  In which state is public-lands ranching the most prevalent?  Where is the largest grazing allotment?

The grazing program fact sheet says that the BLM collected $17.3 million for livestock grazing in 2018.  The fee that year was $1.41 per AUM, so 12.3 million AUMs were sold to the public-lands ranchers.

That’s two million cow/calf pairs on 155 million acres, assuming a six month grazing season, for a stocking rate of 12.9 cow/calf pairs per thousand acres.

The stocking rate for wild horses on BLM land is currently about three animals per thousand acres.

Now, which species is overpopulated?

Wild horses on public lands consume about one million AUMs per year.

The forage sold to public-lands ranchers would support ONE MILLION wild horses.

Approximately 50,000 wild horses are warehoused in off-range corrals and pastures.

Livestock allowed on public lands are worth over TWO BILLION DOLLARS, assuming half of them ship to slaughter.

Advocacy groups that push PZP are so far gone—and so out of touch—that you should not be giving them any of your money.

RELATED: Livestock Grazing in Nevada, Public-Lands Ranching Is Big Business.

AML-1

Residents Want Answers About Heber Wild Horse Shootings

Thirty federally protected horses have been found dead of possible gunshot wounds in the last 15 months and the investigation has not turned up any suspects or motives.

Some residents and visitors to the forest are worried that the shooter could pose a threat to the public, according to a report posted today by the White Mountain Independent.

RELATED: Necropsies Performed on Heber Wild Horses.

Floyd County Horse Deaths Prompt Legislative Action

A resolution was introduced yesterday in the Kentucky state senate calling for the creation of an Abandoned Horse Task Force.  If approved, the group would discuss the problems caused by abandoned horses, ways to stop individuals from abandoning their horses and ways to remove horses currently running at large, according to a report posted today by the Louisville Courier Journal.

The three surviving horses are still roaming the area near the mine and the reward for information on the shootings has risen to $23,000.

RELATED: Floyd County Wild Horse Rescue in Progress.

Seaman Roundup Ends

BLM said today that operations concluded on January 12, with 420 wild horses gathered from two Herd Areas.  Eleven deaths were reported (2.6%) and no horses were returned their home range.  Refer to this news release for details.

The gather stats indicated that the captured horses included 48 foals.  Is that what you’d expect to find in a herd that’s growing at a rate of 20% per year?

RELATED: Seaman Roundup Continues.

Eagle Wild Horses Get Short End of Stick

The roundup announced last week at Eagle HMA, the largest of the three HMAs in the Eagle Complex, will achieve a thriving ecological balance on the affected lands.

Sounds great, but what does that mean in terms of the numbers?

The HMA (not the Complex) contains 670,000 acres according to Table 1 in the final EA and has an AML of 210, for an aimed-at population density (stocking rate) of 0.3 horses per thousand acres.

Because they graze twelve months per year, the forage requirement for the 210 horses allowed by plan is 2,520 AUMs per year.

The next step is to estimate the forage allocated to livestock inside the HMA, the number of cow/calf pairs allowed on the HMA and the cow/calf density in the HMA, to be compared to the same figures for horses.

The HMA intersects nine grazing allotments.  The size of the allotments, their grazing seasons, the portions inside the HMA and the historical forage consumption are given in Table 3.2 of the EA.

The permitted AUMs, not given in the table, were estimated from historical use.

For example, the average use at Wilson Creek is 20,408 AUMs per year, which corresponds to 45% of the permitted AUMs.  Therefore, the estimated forage consumption allowed by plan on that allotment is 20,408 ÷ .45 = 45,351 AUMs per year.

Likewise for the other allotments.  Those figures are shown in red on the following spreadsheet.

Eagle HMA Calcs-1

The Wilson Creek permittee(s) would have to place 3,779 cow/calf pairs on the allotment to graze off 45,351 AUMs in 12 months (45,351 ÷ 12), for a stocking rate of 3.5 cow/calf pairs per thousand acres (3,779 ÷ 1,090,414 × 1,000).

Given that 47% of the allotment lies within the HMA, the estimated forage available to livestock inside the HMA is 45,351 × .47 = 21,315 AUMs per year, which would feed 1,776 cow/calf pairs over a 12 month grazing season (21,315 ÷ 12).

The total calculated acreage inside the HMA is very close to the 670,000 acres contained by the HMA, so little if any of the HMA is not subject to permitted livestock grazing.

The total estimated forage available to livestock inside the HMA is 25,739 AUMs per year, which would support 2,286 cow/calf pairs over a weighted average grazing season of 11.3 months.

The EA notes on page 24 that “wild horses are present year-round and their impacts to rangeland resources cannot be controlled through establishment of a grazing system, such as for livestock.”  Apparently, the writers didn’t notice that the cattle are on the land for roughly the same amount of time!

The estimated stocking rate allowed by plan for livestock inside the HMA is 3.4 cow/calf pairs per thousand acres.

These figures are compared in the following charts.

Eagle HMA Charts-1

The thriving ecological balance is not a balance at all.  Perhaps the BLM should refer to it as the thriving ecological bias (in favor of privately owned cattle and sheep).

The cattle allowed on the HMA each year are probably worth over $2 million, assuming that half of them ship to slaughter, versus a forage cost of $35,000 at current prices.

The forage allocated to livestock on the HMA would support an additional 2,145 wild horses (25,739 ÷ 12), for an AML of 2,355.

Even in the face of these results, the PZP zealots will spend the weekend cleaning their darting rifles, because they do not want to know the truth about America’s wild horses.

RELATED: Hypothesis, Reiterated, Public-Lands Ranching Is Big Business.

PSA 12-15-19

What Do the Stats Tell You About the Seaman Roundup?

BLM reported that 162 studs, 187 mares and 48 foals had been gathered, as of 01-09-20, with no animals returned to their home range.

The contractor captured more mares than studs but does that result point to anything unusual or can the difference be attributed to chance?

The sex of the foals was not given so their number should be omitted from the total.

The expected proportion of mares and studs is .50 (50%), but that is a property of an indefinitely large number of horses.

The observed proportions are .464 for studs and .536 for mares, with n = 349.

The range of variation attributable to chance can be computed from basic statistical formulas, where p-bar = .50 and n = 349.  The observed proportions fall within the calculated limits of .420 and .580, so these results don’t point to anything unusual.

That doesn’t mean the contractor wasn’t asked to alter the herd in some manner, such as skewing the sex ratio of the herd in favor of studs, only that there’s no evidence of that in these data.

Bachelor bands may blend with family bands in a helicopter roundup, resulting in a more-or-less even distribution of males and females in the traps.

Any sex ratio skewing would have to be accomplished by selective return.

RELATED: Seaman Roundup Continues.