Poisoning of Wild Horses No Longer Allowed?

You can’t poison their water holes per 18 USC 3 §47, a common practice before 1959.

Poisoning Wild Horses Outlawed 09-29-24

Today, the advocates poison the mares with Zonastat-H, a restricted-use pesticide that tricks their immune systems into attacking their ovaries.

Better Way 10-25-23

The ranchers are also involved, but they prefer GonaCon Equine.

Their methods may differ but their goal is the same: Ranching superiority in the lawful homes of wild horses.

RELATED: If You Want to Help the Ranchers Give Money to the Advocates.

FY25 Roundup Plan to Build on FY24 Successes?

It’s not about healthy horses on healthy rangelands as suggested in the September 26 blog post, it’s about ranching superiority in the lawful homes of wild horses, sometimes referred to as achieving and maintaining AMLs.

The advocates stopped playing for the home team years ago.  Today, they support the effort through their darting programs (first part of schedule).

Ranchers perform the task in Oregon.

In herds where field-darting is not practical, the BLM will capture the animals, provide the treatment and return them to the range.  These incidents have been marked “CTR.”

The column did not indicate how much forage had been assigned to livestock in the areas targeted for removal, which would allow you to decide by calculation if they’re really overpopulated.

FY25 begins on October 1.

RELATED: FY25 Roundup Schedule Issued.

Working Together for a Horse-Free Future 12-21-22

Foal-Free Friday, Breaking the Addiction Edition

The advocates say that wild horse adopters should not receive cash incentives because they turn the process into a money-making venture, with some animals ending up in slaughter.

Similarly, the advocates should not be given financial support because it fuels their obsession with pesticides, primarily PZP.

Instead, they should be given vouchers for treatment at Betty Ford clinics or similar institutions, where they can be deprogrammed and educated in basic math, rational thought and intellectual integrity.

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Gaslighting Your Supporters Edition.

Sand Wash Advocates 01-17-22

Another Sign the Advocates Want the Ranchers to Win

You’re seeing cow poop where you previously saw horse poop.

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, a leader in nonmotorized removal and staunch opponent of principal use, pursues the Virginia Range mares relentlessly.

The PZP darting program, now in its sixth year, has moved into the sterilization phase, which may explain why it hasn’t posted the Year 6 agreement with NDA to its darting resources page.

It may contain terms like “tipping point” and “no looking back,” as its adherents lucture you about the safety and reversibility of the pesticide.

This bogus advocacy group will do anything to win the approval of the bureaucrats and ranchers, including total herd destruction.

RELATED: If You Want to Help the Ranchers Give Money to the Advocates.

Cowpie on Virginia Range 09-25-24

SHOCKER: New PLC President Is a Public-Lands Rancher

He assumed the role at the end of the 56th Annual Meeting according to a September 20 news release.

As a role model for the industry, his allotments meet or exceed standards for rangeland health.  Right?

The Operator Information and Allotment Information reports at RAS tied him to these authorizations and allotments, all in the Royal Gorge Field Office.

  • 0502003 – WEST BOX CANYON
  • 0503694 – HAYDEN RANCH
  • 0503746 – BEAR CREEK
  • 0505292 – HOWARD CREEK
  • 0505310 – MAVERICK GULCH

The Allotment Master Report provides management status, acreage and active AUMs.

Canterbury Allotment Calcs 09-23-24

The operation is on the small side, putting the new president in the figurehead category.

All of the public acres are in the Improve category, which should be an embarrassment to PLC.

The parcels support livestock equivalent to 70 wild horses, with an average stocking rate of 4.8 animals per thousand public acres.

The bureaucrats and ranchers tell us that public lands in the western U.S. can only support one wild horse per thousand acres (27,000 animals on 27 million acres), which should bring more embarrassment.

The advocates, defeated a long time ago and now in their camp, bolster the narrative with their darting programs.

RELATED: Winners of 2024 Stewardship Awards Announced.

Advocates Not Ill-Informed on Subject of Wild Horses?

So says one of their leaders in today’s news release on PRN.

Judge for yourself.

They’ve published a list of recommendations for the BLM covering ethical and effective wild horse and burro management.

It was developed at the SOWH Conference in Reno where there was no condemnation of the Virginia Range mass sterilization program, despite its proximity to the hotel-casino.

The page includes a form that will add your name to the signatories.

Western Horse Watchers offers the following suggestions as a starting point for meaningful discussion.

  • Confine the ranchers to their base properties in a year-round off season
  • Restore the WHB Act to its original form
  • Neutralize the influence of farm bureaus, stock grower’s associations, public lands councils and wildlife groups on government
  • Acquire base properties as they come on the market and flip the grazing preference to horses or burros
  • Keep the pesticide pushers off the public lands

A guiding principle in the SOWH recommendations is that they could be implemented without any changes to policy and law.

The cover letter was not addressed to anyone in the Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for wild horses and burros on Forest Service lands.

RELATED: SOWH Releases Videos from Reno Conference.

Wild Horse Adoptions Conserve Public Lands?

Suppose you adopt a mom-baby pair at one of the BLM off-range corrals, captured earlier this year in a wild horse roundup.

How much does the on-range population change?

What is the change in resource loading?

How many public acres were conserved?

Zip, zero and zilch, respectively.

So why would the writer of an opinion piece in today’s edition of The Nevada Independent peddle wild horse adoptions as conservation?

Because they free-up space in the corrals, allowing more horses to be taken off the range, conserving resources for the public-lands ranchers.

The author forgot to mention them.

“The equines generally inhabit rugged, remote, arid landscapes where they compete with mule deer, pronghorn, sage-grouse and other wildlife for water and forage.”

There aren’t many predators in those areas because they have been minimized in the name of animal agriculture.

Public lands in Nevada can’t support 38,000 wild horses and burros but they can support livestock equivalent to 173,000 wild horses.

The Property and Environment Research Center advocates for market solutions to conservation so let’s put labels on range-fed beef saying it was produced on public lands at the expense of America’s wild horses and let consumers pick the winners and losers.

RELATED: AIP Turns 5.

Range Fed Beef