A July 10 press release by the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses says the incident is expected to become the largest wild horse removal effort in Nevada history, which is not true.
The mass sterilization program on the Virginia Range, targeting over 3,000 wild horses, is the largest removal effort in the state, and it’s inflicted by the writers of the news release.
As usual, the charlatans call for effective management strategies grounded in science, transparency and humane stewardship, codewords for long-term use of PZP, with the inevitable result of permanent infertility and herd collapse.
One of their dupes, who stars in the Yellowstone spinoff Marshals, said “This isn’t about population control.”
Yes it is.
They are pesticide salesmen, not conservationists, and don’t deserve a penny of your support.
Today a U.S. District Judge granted a preliminary injunction barring federal agencies from classifying the horses as unauthorized livestock and preventing them from capturing and removing them according to a report by Courthouse News Service.
The order applies to all horses in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests not just the Heber WHT.
Families were roaming the sage, foals were discovering the world and mares were carrying the next generation.
Oh the humanity!
Do you know who wrote this crap?
The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, a leader in nonmotorized removal and instigator of the largest attempted eradication of wild horses in Nevada.
Another project has been created in ePlanning and two documents have been uploaded.
The Decision Record says the agency is closing public lands within five miles of active trapping locations and temporary holding facilities to all public entry for the duration of the incident.
Only operations personnel and any public observers who are escorted by BLM staff will be allowed in the closure area.
A map on the last page shows the project area but does not indicate trap locations.
Burros that have migrated into the Complex will also be taken into custody.
A helicopter will push the animals into the traps.
Operations will be open to public observation on a limited basis, which contradicts a closure notice issued today.
Animals not put down at the temporary holding pens will be taken to the off-range corrals at Palomino Valley and the privately owned facility known as Indian Lakes.
There are no plans to treat any of the mares with fertility control pesticides and return them to the range.
If it was, your faithful public servants would not be trying to insert “production-oriented livestock” into the Part 4100 regulations, restricting grazing permits to operations that produce meat, milk or fiber.
They are, in effect, trying to make wild animal preserves illegal, even though the concept has been demonstrated in Montana, Nevada and Colorado.
Did you know the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, though its LLC in Nevada, holds 75% of the active AUMs in the Buckeye Allotment?
Why hasn’t the nonprofit converted its preference to wild horses, establishing the Pine Nut Wild Horse Preserve? There would finally be winners of the Buckeye Lottery.
Approval of the grazing rule update would give it the perfect excuse to continue running cattle on the allotment, much to the delight of its allies, the public-lands ranchers.
The ranching advocacy group stated in a May 12 news release that the reforms were a clear signal of BLM’s commitment to restoring effective multiple-use management, which is not true.
The update would reduce the uses of public lands identified for grazing, limiting them to production-oriented livestock.
There would be no opportunities for conversion of allotments to wild animal preserves, a practice that has already been demonstrated in Montana, Nevada and Colorado.
If multiple use was really the goal, the rules would not only accommodate allotment repurposing but encourage it, at great savings to American taxpayers.
The doctrine of multiple use will apply to allotments in areas identified for wild horses and burros, as it does now.
Livestock will be authorized in those areas and will be entitled to most of the resources.
The doctrine will not apply to allotments outside those areas.
Owning or leasing base properties and petitioning the government for changes in livestock types and seasons of use, will no longer be recognized as a method for establishing wild animal preserves on public lands.
The Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of the Benton Paiute Reservation brought the case earlier this week according to a story by Native News Online.
The complaint alleges that the defendants, which include the BLM and Forest Service, did not complete the legally required government-to-government consultation, identifying sacred sites and cultural resources within the operation’s footprint, or assessing the impact of helicopter operations on Benton Paiute land.
The plaintiffs asked the court to vacate and set aside the 2025 Decision Record and halt the removal of wild horses from the project area, among other things.