Would you attend a conference organized by those who say PZP is not a pesticide?
Should you support an organization that
- Protects wild mustangs by destroying their ovaries with said pesticide?
- Admits they’re getting rid of wild horses and won’t tell you how far they plan to go?
- Wants to move free-roaming horses from their lawful homes to remote wilderness areas, leaving all of their food to the public-lands ranchers?
What about groups that
- Care far more about their standing with the bureaucrats and ranchers than they do about the horses?
- Want to be leaders in the wild horse removal industry?
- Won’t provide data for their darting programs, including herd sizes, demographics and changes year over year?
What about individuals that
- Refer to sterilized mares as self-boosting?
- Describe abnormal sex ratios as mares living longer?
- Say preservation when they mean eradication?
- Tell you the herds are aging out, not dying off?
- Want the ranchers to succeed, not the horses?
- Treat their cherished/beloved/innocent wild horses as pests.
What should you believe? Their words or their deeds?
RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Fooling You with Euphemisms Edition.
Western Horse Watchers Association 