Assateague Herd Grows Slightly

The Park Service reported in an undated news release that the population in March 2025 was 79, up from 73 a year earlier.

The herd consisted of 47 females and 32 males, a ratio of approximately 1.5 to 1.

Four deaths and ten births were recorded.

The article did not indicate if mares had been brought in from other areas to replace those ruined by the darting program.

The population has remained below target for seven years.

RELATED: If PZP Is Reversible, Why Is the Assateague Herd Still Shrinking?

Foal-Free Friday, Attempting the Impossible Edition

The Salt River advocates are trying to cut the herd size in half with PZP, as if they can put it into a nosedive for ten years and have it come in for a soft landing.

The Virginia Range advocates are trying to achieve a reduction of 80% or more with the same pesticide.

The herds will auger in.

The final populations will be zero because most of the mares will be sterile, if they aren’t already.

Those that bear fruit, not enough to overcome the death rate, likely have faulty immune systems, a trait that could be passed on to their offspring.

This is what the advocates bring to the table.

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Uproar and Outrage Edition.

Lahontan Planning Documents Out for Public Review

A preliminary environmental assessment has been copied to the project folder with several appendices.

Comments will be accepted through May 12 according to the news release.

The Proposed Action, discussed in Section 2.3 of the EA, would remove all excess horses from an area that is roughly 25 times larger than the HMA.

Figure 1 shows the arrangement.

The current population is thought to be 518.

The AML is 7 – 10 so 511 animals are on the chopping block.

There are no plans to treat any of the mares with fertility control pesticides and return them to the range.

A roundup does not appear on the latest schedule.

Table 1 says the HMA is 100% within the Lahontan Allotment but Figure 2 suggests otherwise.

RELATED: Scoping Begins for Lahontan Wild Horse Roundup.

San Bernardino County Launches New Plan for Wild Burros

Officials have contracted with DonkeyLand to relocate orphaned, sick or injured animals and castrate 100 jacks over the next year according to a report by the Los Angeles Times.

The article did not indicate if the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, a leader in nonmotorized removal, had offered to pummel the jennies with pesticide-laced darts at no cost to the government.

RELATED: San Bernadino County Hits Pause on Reche Canyon Burro Removal.

Legislation to Protect TRNP Wild Horses Introduced in Senate

The bill would maintain a genetically diverse herd of at least 150 animals according to a report by KX News.

The story did not indicate if it was prompted by SCR 4006.

The measure was introduced on April 9, read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

The bill text was not immediately available.

RELATED: Breeding Population More Important Than Herd Size.

Forage Required by Wild Horses and Burros on BLM Lands

Are the figures in this Google search result correct?

Reagan’s doctrine of “trust but verify” does not apply to the wild horse advocates.

They cannot be trusted.

The final page of the 2025 population dataset gives post-Rock Springs AMLs of 22,637 wild horses and 2,919 wild burros.

Therefore, the total number of animals allowed by plan is correct.

22,637 + 2,919 = 25,556

One AUM will sustain one cow-calf pair, one wild horse, two burros or five sheep for one month.

So the total forage requirement is

22,637 × 12 + 2,919 × 12 ÷ 2 = 289,158 AUMs per year

Like the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, Return to Normal (Before WHB Act) is a strong supporter of nonmotorized removal,

The nonprofit works closely with the FREES Network, a ranching advocacy group sponsored by Utah State University Extension, and signed onto the “Path Forward,” a 2019 plan for ranching superiority in the lawful homes of wild horses and burros.

RELATED: BLM Releases 2025 Wild Horse and Burro Population Dataset.

NOTE: Initially CAAWH opposed the Path Forward but now accepts it.

Overpopulation and AMLs

AMLs are often expressed as a range, such as 120 – 200.

In this example, horse #121 is excess, the beginning of overpopulation according to current management practices.

The high end of the range usually corresponds to around 20% of the authorized forage.

The management plan allows 200 wild horses and livestock equivalent to 800 horses.

If the current population is less than 5X AML, the HMA is not overpopulated from a resource viewpoint, but the ranchers won’t be able to access all of the AUMs on their permits until corrective actions are taken.

The AML range usually allows for a doubling of herd size between those actions.

A narrow range means little if any growth.

The new AML at Pryor Mountain, 107 – 120, implies heavy use of fertility control pesticides and sterilization of mares, synonymous with conservation in advocacy circles.

RELATED: BLM Releases Pryor Mountain Final Planning Documents.

Foal-Free Friday, Uproar and Outrage Edition

There is much distress among the advocates at the prospects of losing 3,700 wild horses in three HMAs in Wyoming, yet there is nary a concern about the fate of wild horses at the Salt River and Virginia Range.

There, the advocates are wiping out herds of approximately 300 and 3,400, respectively, by sterilizing the mares.

Why is the former considered eradication while the latter passes for conservation?

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Cycle of Dependency Edition.

Scoping Begins for Lincoln County Public Lands Sale

The project covers the sale of approximately 5,500 acres in 66 parcels according to the BLM news release.

Some are the Caliente Complex.

The scoping report includes eight maps showing their locations.

To find them in the ArcGIS viewer, turn on the PLSS layer and zoom/drag the map to the township-range blocks indicated in the report.

To identify the overlapping herd areas and allotments, turn on those layers.

Map 1 of 8

  • No parcels in herd areas

Map 2 of 8

  • In Little Mountain HA
    • Rnd 9, Caliente C, Sec 27, 40 acres
    • Rnd 10, Caliente B, Sec 27, 40 acres
    • Rnd 10, Caliente A, Sec 27, 40 acres
    • Rnd 9, Caliente D, Sec 27, 40 acres
  • In Clover Creek HA
    • Rnd 6, Caliente A, Sec 08, 80 acres
    • Rnd 6, Caliente B, Sec 17, 160 acres
    • Rnd 5, Caliente A, Sec 14, 640 acres

Map 3 of 8

  • No parcels in herd areas

Map 4 of 8

  • No parcels in herd areas

Map 5 of 8

  • In Fortification HA
    • Rnd 10, Mount Wilson B, Sec 34, 20 acres
    • Rnd 10, Mount Wilson A, Sec 34, 20 acres
    • Rnd 5, Mount Wilson A, Sec 34, 40 acres
    • Rnd 5, Mount Wilson B, Sec 34, 40 acres

Map 6 of 8

  • In Little Mountain HA
    • Rnd 5, Panaca A, Sec 16, 40 acres
    • Rnd 5, Panaca B, Sec 16, 40 acres
    • Rnd 5, Panaca C, Sec 20, 40 acres
    • Rnd 6 Panaca A, Sec 19, 40 acres

Map 7 of 8

  • No parcels in herd areas

Map 8 of 8

  • No parcels in herd areas

The following image shows the 640-acre parcel in map 2 of 8, east of Caliente NV.

The project description does not say how the land would be offered for sale or when.