The BLM should give the darting program a chance according to the writer of a letter to the Powell Tribune.

The herd is aging.  The death rate is increasing.  The ranchers need to be patient.

GonaCon will sterilize the mares.

If the agency removes the younger horses the herd will be in danger of dying out.

The capture goal will bring the herd well below the 150 adults needed to maintain genetic viability.

What a bunch of crap!

PZP sterilizes mares.

As birth rates go down, the herds die off.

Breeding populations are too small to sustain genetic diversity.

The minimum herd size of 150 to 200 wild horses (recommended in Section 4.4.6.3 of the WHB Handbook) assumes the advocates are not trying to beat the populations down with ovary-killing pesticides.

The Salt River and Virginia Range, known for their fanatical darting programs, have herds well above 150 but the advocates are driving the breeding populations to zero.

They are responsible for as much or more long-term harm as the federal government.

RELATED: Advocates Say McCullough Peaks Roundup Not Necessary.

The mares have been darted with birth control medication for years.  It’s an aging population that will shrink naturally through deaths from old age.

Six horses died over the summer and more will be lost to winterkill according to an advocate interviewed for a story dated October 30 by Cowboy State Daily.

Articles like this confirm your suspicions that they’re sick in the head and want the ranchers to win.

The HMA has the unfortunate distinction of being in the motorized and nonmotorized removal sections of the latest schedule.

RELATED: McCullough Herd to Achieve AML on its Own?

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses answers three questions about wild horses in a news flash posted by Lucky Three Ranch.

• Are wild horses and burros overpopulated?  NO!
• Are wild horses and burros responsible for overgrazing on public lands?  NO!
• Are wild horses native?  They are a native re-introduced species.

If horses are not the problem, why are they trying to get rid of them?

On the Virginia Range, they’ve pumped an astonishing 8,116 doses of Zonastat-H into the herd since 2019.  Many of the mares are now at risk of sterility.

At the Salt River, their affiliate, the Salt River Wild Horse Darting Group, is not trying to slow population growth, they’re trying to reverse it.  Same as the Virginia Range.

At Cedar Mountain in Utah, CAAWH received $91,865.50 from the BLM to spread the poison around in that HMA.  The money didn’t just fall out of the sky, they requested it!

What do these examples have in common?

Their words say “We love the horses” but their deeds say “We despise them.”

This is standard practice for the wild horse advocates.

They are like the scribes and pharisees of the New Testament.  They sail the high seas to win one convert then make him twice as deserving of Hell as they are.

“I am not the only one doubting your advocacy for wild horses,” she wrote in an October 14 email.

You got a mouse in your pocket?

To repeat: I am not an advocate.  I am a voice for wild horses.  The advocates are part of the problem.

If you want to dabble in this field, you need to put on your big girl panties and admit that your ranks are filled with liars and frauds.

There is no two-state solution on America’s public lands, the ranchers must be defeated.

Confine them to their (multi-million dollar) base properties and let them pay the going rate to feed their animals.

No more gravy train, no more sucking on the government teat.

It’s time to man up and oppose the removal of wild horses from their lawful homes by any means, whether it’s helicopters, bait or pesticides.

RELATED: Western Horse Watchers Q&A.

In this role, you will analyze and interpret Wild Horse and Burro policy and related manual guidance to respond to requests from the District Office, State Office and Headquarters for technical assistance, according to the listing at ZipRecruiter.

For example, if the EPA specifies a minimum 90-day interval between primer and booster doses of GonaCon Equine, you can interpret that as 30 days.

If federal law says wild horses and burros shall be protected from capture, branding, harassment or death, you can ignore it.

If you believe that areas identified for wild horses should be managed primarily for cattle and sheep, you can use your organizing skills to get the ranchers to control the pests, as Shaney Rockefeller did at the Vale Office.

Her advice is only a phone call away.

1. The greatest threat to America’s wild horses is public-lands ranching.

2. The advocates, with their frivolous spending, false promises and obsession with pesticides, are a close #2.  They are part of the problem, not the solution.

3. Drilling and mining are a distant #3.  They affect anywhere from a few acres to a few thousand acres, while animal agriculture devours entire HMAs and beyond.

RELATED: Undeniable Truths of the Wild Horse World.

They sent delegates to the FREES Conference.

Or they lobby for on-range management, referred to on these pages as poisoning the mares with ovary-killing pesticides.

Nevada State Senator Hansen said the BLM was not in bed with the livestock industry at the September 7 “Dust Up in the Desert” but have you ever heard the advocates deny it?

The agency refers to them as partner organizations.

They claim to be voices for the horses while aiding and abetting their removal.

Who benefits from that?

The advocates need donors to sustain their work.

If you’re a hunter, rancher or supporter thereof, little if any convincing is needed.

You might even be tempted to support the legacy contractors but they’re for-profit companies.

What if you actually care about the horses?

If you understand their true intentions and loyalties, you won’t give them a penny.

If you’re new to the wild horse world, you can be propagandized with flowery terms such as cherished/beloved/innocent wild horses, safe/proven/reversible fertility control and humane management.

You become a useful idiot, a person advocating for a cause, usually with devious or ruthless origins, without understanding its means and ends, allowing yourself to be cynically used by its leaders.

Think about that next time you’re counting the Views and Likes on socialist media.

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Safer in Town than on the Range Edition.

Progress in wild horse management is never determined from the horses’ viewpoint, only the special interests who benefit therefrom.

To understand the column about Colorado’s HMAs published today by The Colorado Sun, key terms should be explained.  Meanings can be validated not by what the writer says but by what his organization does.

Herd Management Areas – A continually shrinking subset of the original Herd Areas, managed primarily for livestock with few exceptions, two cited in the article.

Herd Areas – The lawful homes of wild horses and burros, identified in 1971 when the WHB Act was signed into law.

Sustain Wild Horses – Control the pests.

Fertility Control Darting – Beating wild horse populations down with ovary-killing pesticides, usually Zonastat-H or GonaCon Equine, so livestock can access most of their food and water.

Appropriate Management Level – The number of horses allowed by plan, not the number of horses the land can support, usually small relative to the available resources.

Carrying Capacity – The number of wild horses the land can support if it was managed principally for them, referred to on these pages as the True AML.

Healthy Horses on Healthy Rangelands – Appropriate management levels achieved, ranchers enjoying more of what their allotments have to offer.

Partner Organizations – Groups that claim to be voices for the horses while aiding and abetting their removal, referred to on these pages as charlatans.

The author noted that the Sand Wash roundup was called off because of winterkill.

He stated that livestock grazing in Sand Wash Basin and Piceance East Douglas accounts for 14% and 20% of forage use, respectively, while your host has determined that livestock in Sand Wash Basin receive 3.9 times more forage than the horses and those in Piceance East Douglas receive 2.4 times more forage than the horses.

RELATED: What Is a Curated Horse Exhibit?

The BLM reported 31 deaths during the 2022 roundup, but a Freedom of Information request revealed that 69 additional animals died at government holding facilities during and after the roundup.

Fourteen of the deaths were very young foals.

Government records suggested they were foundering due to being run too far during the gather.

One report attributed a death to the stress of being run long distances in rough terrain and in high temperatures.

“It was heartbreaking.”

Who published the findings?

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses.

They hate foals!  They’re trying to get rid of as many as possible on the Virginia Range.

They tell you these things because they’re trying to separate you from your money.

Don’t fall for it.  They are a voice for the bureaucrats and ranchers, not wild horses.

Helicopter roundups are the fastest and most effective way to shift resources from wild horses to the public-lands ranchers.

The optics aren’t great, especially when injuries are caught on film, but at least they are seen and understood by the public.

Have you ever seen video of horses being shot in the head by wranglers because of blindness, swayback or club feet?

It happens at most roundups but is concealed from the public, even the observers who are stationed a mile or more from the trap site.

The advocates have a better way.

Don’t even let them be born.

Snuff out new life and let the herds die off.

Let the ranchers have all of their food and water.

Put the legacy contractors out of business.

Replace motorized removals with removal by pesticides.

The public won’t notice, won’t even care, and that’s a problem.

They’re taking wild horse removals out of the spotlight.

We need to keep the pressure up, keep the bureaucrats and politicians on the hot seat.

That’s what Velma did.

Pay no attention to the advocates.  They’re protecting the ranchers, not the horses.

RELATED: What You Won’t Hear at Wild Horse Lobby Day.

If the delegation is led by pesticide pushers and ranching sympathizers, the predominant constituency in wild horse advocacy, there will be no requests to

• Publish forage allocations and other pertinent data showing how wild horse and burro areas are managed by federal agencies
• Return all lands identified in 1971 to wild horses and burros
• Confine the ranchers to their base properties in a year-round off season, a practice they are already doing on a part-time basis
• Revise the RMPs to shift the forage in said lands back to the horses and burros
• Manage said areas principally for wild horses and burros as specified in the original statute
• Prohibit inconspicuous methods of removal, such as bait trapping and on-range darting with fertility control pesticides

Instead, you’ll hear complaints about

• Drilling and mining, which affect anywhere from a few acres to a few thousand acres, while permitted grazing devours entire HMAs and beyond
• Helicopter roundups, if used for forcible removal but not for catch-treat-release
• Violations of CAWP
• Lack of HMAPs

The advocates will call for an end to the roundups but not the removals, pushing instead for innocuous methods that achieve the same results as helicopters.

RELATED: Wild Horse Lobby Day Set for Next Week.

The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses indicated in the September update that 89 mares received 89 doses of Zonastat-H during the month, 26 given as a primer and 63 as a booster.  If you can’t access the document, click here.

Over the life of the program, 1,949 mares have received 8,116 doses of the pesticide.

The report will be submitted to the Nevada Department of Agriculture.

Of the 163 foals born this year in the primary target zone, 80 have died.

The causes of death were not discussed but predation is likely a factor.

As for the long-term population goal and how many horses they intend to eradicate, the advocates are silent.

No comments about herd demographics.

No discussion of sterility and the growing risk thereof.

The current population is thought to be 3,513 with 356 listed as missing, compared to 3,559 in August, including 395 listed as missing.

A goal for October is to maximize booster treatments, allowing for continued population reduction, equivalent to bait trap removal or helicopter roundups.

RELATED: Virginia Range Darting Update for August 2023.

Sponsored by the Save Our Wild Horses Coalition, participants will have an opportunity meet with lawmakers and urge them to support legislation that protects wild horses and burros.

Sounds great.

But terms in the news release such as humane treatment, living treasures and magnificent animals should raise suspicions.

If the announcement referred to cherished/beloved/innocent wild horses, you could be sure their goal has little to do with protection and much to do with permitted grazing, to be achieved with fertility control programs, not helicopter roundups.

The Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service selected two new members and re-appointed a third, according to a news release dated September 29.

The two new members represent wildlife and livestock management organizations.

The Board advises both agencies on the management and protection of wild horses and burros on public lands.

With two of the nine seats occupied by permittees, you now have the equivalent of two Palestinian advisors setting policy direction toward Israel.

RELATED: WHBAB Nomination Update.

Who claimed on National Public Lands Day that the federal government is determined to shrink wild horse and burro populations even further while giving most of their land to commercial livestock, as it collaborates with the bureaucrats and ranchers to wipe out the herd at Cedar Mountain?

Who’s working with ranching sympathizers at NDA to ruin the Virginia Range herd?

It’s the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, a leader in nonmotorized removal!

RELATED: BLM Awards $1 Million for Wild Horse Protection?

If you’re a politician or bureaucrat, which statement will garner more public support?

1. Achieving and maintaining AMLs will protect rangeland health.

2. Ranchers shall receive at least 80% of the forage in areas set aside for wild horses.

The first statement will likely fool more voters, while statement #2 is the truth.

RELATED: Choosing Your Words Carefully.

A column posted this morning by The Daily Sentinel of Grand Junction, CO, a paper known for its anti-horse bias, claims a new era has dawned in wild horse management.

The term is always a euphemism for beating the populations down with helicopters and pesticides, even if it’s prefixed with “Humane,” so ranchers can access most of their food and water.

You thought things would be different at the state level?

The Wild Horse Working Group is sponsored by the Department of Agriculture, whose mission is to strengthen and advance Colorado agriculture!

A preliminary assessment might start with these questions:

• How many RMPs will be revised in favor of the horses?
• How many ranchers will be confined to their base properties?
• How many HAs will be returned to the horses?
• How many HMAs will be managed principally for wild horses?
• How many advocates will be investigated for unlawful use of pesticides?
• How many contractors will be charged with abuse?

If the sponsors were truly interested in helping the horses, these questions would have nonzero answers.  They don’t.

RELATED: Colorado Wild Horse Project Helps Ranchers, Not Horses.

Consider these two groups.  All were planned, all were carried out by helicopters.

Group 1

• Antelope North
• Antelope South
• West Douglas

Group 2

• Reveille
• Palomino Butte
• Stinkingwater
• Hog Creek
• Owyhee

The first group saw the advocates howling, videos of injured horses, ad hoc lawsuits and news reports about contractor mistreatment.

In the second group, the advocates were silent, with little if any media attention.

Why the difference?

Roundups in the second group were billed as catch-treat-release.

The advocates have their favorite poisons.

Some like Zonastat, others like Gonacon, but all agree that wild horses should be removed from their lawful homes with ovary-killing pesticides, not motorized equipment, even if motorized equipment is needed to apply the poisons!

RELATED: Bold Prediction for Fertility Control Solicitation.

Obsessed with pesticides?  Ranching sympathizer?  Wanna be like the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, Piceance Mustangs and High Desert Strategies?

Then you need to apply for a grant and the September 28 webinar will show you how.

Registration is required.

RELATED: BLM Awards $1 Million for Wild Horse Protection?