Western Horse Watchers Association
Exposing the Hypocrisy, Lies and Incompetence of the Wild Horse Advocates
Opinion
They’re as phony as $3 bills!
The admission by FOAL earlier this week is just the latest revelation.
They’re telling you that they’re saving wild horses while they’re telling the bureaucrats that they’re getting rid of them.
Why support a bunch of liars, defeatists, pesticide pushers and ranching sympathizers?
RELATED: Warning for Giving Tuesday.
With the possibility of a harsh winter on an aging population, the prospects for the McCullough Peaks herd are not great.
But the advocates don’t see that as a problem, they see it as an achievement, an indication that their darting programs are far more effective in the long run than helicopter roundups.
The idea of fully contracepted herds dying off resonates with the American public, where declining moral standards make it an easy sell.
The concept explains why the population grew only 7.4% between 2010 and 2020, and why programs for the elderly, such as Social Security and Medicare, are going bust.
Not enough youngsters to hold up the lower end.
Thus, McCullough Peaks, and other areas where the advocates are snuffing out new life, are microcosms of leftist ideology and a nation that’s destroying itself.
RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Praying for the Horses to Die Edition.
The comment period closes tomorrow.
A story dated November 22 by AP News has been picked up by major news outlets.
The herd you see today is only an exhibit. It has little if any historical significance.
The original wild horses of TRNP, thought to be descendants of Sitting Bull’s ponies, were removed by the Park Service.
Some were rescued by the Kuntz brothers and taken to their ranch near Linton.
They called them Nokotas.
Their story is told in the 2011 documentary “Nokota Heart,” available on YouTube.
Most of this is ignored in the current discussion.
Those who claim to be voices for the horses are as phony as $3 bills.
All the talk about genetic diversity and minimum herd size means nothing when you’re poisoning the mares with ovary-killing pesticides and driving the breeding populations into the single digits.
RELATED: Bold Prediction for Wild Horses at TRNP.
Innumeracy in the wild horse world.
Previous audio snippets can be found in the Index under Microcasts.
RELATED: Warning for Giving Tuesday.
Their target audience is female, liberal and innumerate, apparently, most of whom are aborting, contracepting and sterilizing in their own lives and see the world not as it is but the way it should be according to their ideology.
Consider this remark from a November 10 news flash posted by Lucky Three Ranch:
In the West, wild horses travel in herds that typically consist of one or two stallions, a group of mares, and their offspring. While the dominant stallion protects the herd and steps in when danger arises, the leader is usually a seasoned mare, often called the lead mare.
How many stallions and mares does Suzanne Roy have at her ranch?
If she actually had a family band in her care, uncut and undarted, she’d realize that stallions run the show and would never allow such statements to be sent to donors.
But truth is a handicap for these people.
They don’t care about wild horses.
They care about separating you from your money and using the proceeds to advance the ranching agenda.
And what about the offspring? They are few and far between wherever the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses is involved.
RELATED: How Wild Horse Advocacy Really Works.
You won’t find an advocacy group that isn’t controlled by defeatists, pesticide pushers and ranching sympathizers.
Refer to the list of charlatans for organizations to avoid.
The problem is resource management—the way their land is managed—not the horses.
RELATED: How Wild Horse Advocacy Really Works.
Removal of 41 horses, particularly young, reproductive-age animals, when combined with winter mortality, could create catastrophic consequences for the herd, according to a story posted today by the Cody Enterprise.
The group, a leader in nonmotorized removal, sent a letter to the BLM on November 1 offering money and staff to continue the darting program.
What would be the consequences if you sterilized most of the mares in a herd with your favorite pesticide?
That would be you, on the Virginia Range.
Seven of the McCullough mares have never given birth.
Because the advocates ruined them? Only seven?
The article indicated the breeding population consisted of just 17 mares (plus a few stallions) but did not cite that as a problem or threat to long-term genetic viability!
The writer of the November 18 commentary in the Elko Daily Free Press about the way land and wild horse management really work stated:
There is an aspect of emotion that hangs over wild horse roundups. Wild horse advocates openly profess to love wild horses. The livestock industry, state agency officials, even a few badly biased scientific researchers, hate them.
The advocates say they love wild horses but their actions indicate otherwise.
There is love, however, among the players in the Love Triangle, for each other and for their common goal.
They’re poisoning the mares with ovary-killing pesticides, under the guise of protection and preservation, and they want you to pay for it.
RELATED: How the BLM Really Manages Land and Wild Horses.
The Elko Daily Free Press published a rebuttal today of a November 9 interview about the way the agency manages land and wild horses.
A distinction should be made between the leading consumers of resources on America’s public lands: Those who compete with wild horses and those who don’t.
Drillers and miners are not exploring for forage. Wild horses don’t care about oil, gas, vanadium and uranium.
The conflict is with the public-lands ranchers.
A drill pad might occupy an acre or two and an open pit mine might require a few thousand acres, while permitted grazing devours entire HMAs and beyond.
As for economics, if the BLM pays $60 per AUM for a horse in long-term holding, as noted in the column, while collecting $1.35 per AUM from the permittee whose cow/calf pair replaced him, how can that ever be viewed as a wise use of the public lands?
RELATED: Helicopters Don’t Force Wild Horses to Do Anything?
The advocates are so far gone and so hopelessly lost in their pesticide paradigm that they actually want the horses to die.
One example is McCullough Peaks, where the average age of the herd is increasing, along with the death rate, because few if any new foals are hitting the ground.
The older horses may not survive the winter, which the advocates anticipate and desire.
Anything to avoid motorized removal. Anything to prove their darting programs are working. Anything to keep the resources shifted in favor of the public-lands ranchers.
At the Virginia Range, where the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses operates its flagship darting program, they’re driving the birth rate to zero and letting the herd die off.
They’re telling you that they’re saving the horses while they’re telling the bureaucrats that they’re getting rid of them.
Their affiliates in Arizona are doing the same thing to the Salt River herd, where a zero percent birth rate and six percent death rate will be needed for ten consecutive years to achieve the population target.
By then the mares will be sterile and the herd will be lost.
Ditto for the Virginia Range.
These groups should be banned from areas identified for wild horses.
RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, Snubbing the Wild Horse Advocates Edition.
The Park Service will opt for Alternative C—a fully contracepted herd that dies off—and the advocates will be tripping over each other to win the contract to carry it out.
You can be sure that preliminary talks have already been held.
Their faux opposition was showmanship designed to separate you from your money.
RELATED: Park Service Extends TRNP Comment Period.
A year ago it’s what the advocates wanted for all wild horses, but now that the Park Service has proposed it for the horses at TRNP, they oppose it.
Actually, they still like the idea, but if you knew that they’d lose your financial support.
Kinda like the one-horse pony telling his voters they didn’t have to pay back their student loans.
The idea fizzled after the election.
A BLM wild horse and burro specialist said the number could have been two to three times higher if it wasn’t for the 2021 roundup, according to a story by the Steamboat Pilot & Today.
Makes perfect sense. Take them all off the range.
Give everything to the public-lands ranchers.
RELATED: Vegetation Study to Determine Sand Wash Carrying Capacity?
The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses indicated in the October report that 120 mares received 121 doses of Zonastat-H during the month, 20 given as a primer and 101 as a booster.
Over the life of the program, which began in 2019, 1,961 mares have received an astonishing 8,231 doses of the ovary-killing pesticide.
Of the 169 foals born this year in the primary target zone, 85 have died.
The current population is thought to be 3,498 with 338 horses listed as missing, compared to 3,513 with 356 listed as missing in September.
Not discussed in the report:
The program, now in its fifth year, is at the point of no return.
The report will be submitted to the Nevada Department of Agriculture.
RELATED: Virginia Range Darting Update for September 2023.
The aging population may suffer major losses this winter, according to the advocates, but this is not a normal condition of a wild horse herd—unless it can’t have any babies.
Who’s responsible for that?
The bureaucrats may have requested a darting program, but the advocates delivered it.
RELATED: Advocate Takes McCullough Plea to Casper.
This letter to the editor marks her third attempt to forestall the bait-trap removal at McCullough Peaks, which was set to begin on November 1.
She’s so far gone and so lost in the pesticide paradigm that she can’t even see that she’s advocating for the ranchers, not the horses.
Let’s take a closer look.
From the second paragraph: To avoid motorized removal, the BLM implemented a reversible birth control program using Porcine Zona Pellucida. This program, administered through field darting, reduced the birth rate to 2% annually, keeping the herd’s numbers within the appropriate management level of 70-140 horses.
It’s not reversible! Damage begins with the first injection and progresses to sterility after five consecutive years. This is happening at the Virginia Range. The advocates refer to these mares as self-boosting.
If the birth rate is 2% per year, the growth rate is -3% per year, assuming a 5% death rate, meaning the herd is shrinking. Exactly what the ranchers want!
Third paragraph: The BLM’s plan involves trapping and removing 41 or more wild horses and using a controversial fertility control vaccine called GonaCon on the mares, for which preliminary evidence indicates permanent sterility.
It’s a pesticide not a vaccine! Vaccines prevent illness, supposedly.
A 2017 labeling amendment extended the interval between primer and booster from 30 days to 90 days but the BLM ignores it, an issue for law enforcement.
The remark about sterility is likely true, because the agency prefers it almost exclusively to PZP. Just look at the news releases over the past year. The condition is sometimes described as long-term infertility.
Fourth paragraph: The aging herd, with a significant portion over 15 years old and 22 horses over 20 years old, requires a population of at least 150 breeding aged adults for genetic viability. To make matters worse, the operation is scheduled to take place next month, before the impact of winter conditions can be assessed, possibly resulting in a slow decline toward extinction of this cherished herd.
That’s not the concern! It’s the size of the breeding population that matters. The 2% birth rate suggests it’s very small and that would be true if the AML was 500.
Describing the herd as “cherished” suggests she walks in lockstep with the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses, a leader in nonmotorized removal.
No word about resource management and the prevalence of livestock in the HMA.
Next to the federal government, nobody’s getting rid of more wild horses and causing more long-term harm than the advocates.
Opposition to wild horses is expected from hunters, ranchers and bureaucrats who manage the public lands for their benefit.
But not from the advocates, who claim to be voices for the horses.
One of the most pressing issues in the wild horse world is to expose, dislodge and dismantle these groups, prohibiting their staff and membership from ever stetting foot in areas identified for wild horses.
Consider this example from the Virginia Range:
Scenario A, man kills stallion with arrow. Horse not replaced because the advocates have poisoned the mares with Zonastat-H
Scenario B, stallion dies of natural causes and is not replaced because the advocates sterilized the mares with Zonastat-H
Scenario A is bad, but Scenario B is good, according to the advocates.
Barren mares, shrinking herds and loss of genetic diversity are also good and the advocates are positioning themselves to be leaders in the industry.
They use footage from roundups to convince you that removal by pesticide is better than removal by helicopter.
They want you to think they have all the answers. They can’t distinguish between cause and effect, and won’t look at the data, so they don’t even know what the problem is.
And they hate dissent. If you disagree with them, or their allies, you’ll be disappeared by their big-tech minions.
This commentary was inspired by the real estate agent and PZP darter in the Minden/Gardnerville area, whose column about inhumane treatment of animals appears in the October edition of Horse Tales, starting at the bottom of page eight.
Naturally, she absolved herself and other field workers from any wrongdoing and couldn’t heap enough praise on the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses and Wild Horse Eradication, two of the greatest offenders.
Next to the federal government, nobody’s getting rid of more wild horses and causing more long-term harm than the advocates.
RELATED: Combatting Duplicity in the Wild Horse World.
Proposals should align with the 2021 Strategic Plan and funding is subject to Congressional direction and appropriations. according to yesterday’s news release.
Priorities include new or improved fertility control methods for wild horses, examining the relationships between wild horses or burros and their environment, and improving a variety of wild horse and burro program activities, such as aerial surveys, genetic monitoring, animal handling, adoption rates and the human dimensions of wild horse and burro management.
An interesting topic in the area of human dimensions would be the role of moral depravity in wild horse and burro management.
For example, how do promiscuity, adultery, contraception, abortion, sterilization, divorce and sexual perversion (LGBT) influence policy and practice?
How many of the advocates subscribe to these values?
As for the role of man-made climate change, there is none.
Absence of predators? Totally man made, to protect the most noble and deserving nonnative species on America’s public lands.
RELATED: Decision Published for Fertility Control Research.
Traffic from Facebook returned to the new normal last month after an unexpected jump in September.
The downward trend in 2023 may indicate that material by Western Horse Watchers has been banned or blocked by the advocates.
Hopefully their little Potemkin Villages are crumbling.
WordPress stopped reporting traffic from Twitter in August 2023.
RELATED: Socialist Media Update for September 2023.
Western Horse Watchers Association 