House Committee Approves DOI Spending Bill

Today the House Appropriations Committee approved the Interior-Environment funding bill for FY 2021, including $102.6 million for the WHB program.  Refer to page 11 in the bill report for details.  The program received $101.6 million in FY 2020.

The bill now heads to the full House for a vote, according to a press release by Animal Wellness Action, a lobbying group in Washington, DC.

AWA joined AWHC in urging legislators to “implement PZP birth control instead of cruel helicopter chases,” which is what you’d expect from organizations that have bought into the overpopulation narrative.

PSA 12-03-19

Coyote Lake Horses Get Short End of Stick

The Decision Record for wild horse management actions in the Barren Valley Complex authorized the implementation of Alternative 1, the Proposed Action, as identified in Section 2.0 of the Final EA.  There will be no significant impacts in carrying out the plan, except on the horses.

The management plan for the Coyote Lake-Alvord-Tule Springs HMA allows 390 wild horses on 559,400 acres, for a stocking rate of 0.7 horses per thousand acres.  Recall from the discussion in April that fractional stocking rates may indicate large amounts of forage diverted to privately owned livestock.

The Rule of Four suggests that 4 × 390 = 1,560 wild horses have been denied a spot on the HMA.  The Rule of Five suggests the land should be able to support 5 × 390 = 1,950 wild horses.  Let’s see how these estimates compare to figures determined the hard way.

The management plan allocates 12 × 390 = 4,680 AUMs per year to the horses, per Section 3.2.1 of the EA.  The current population, thought to be around 550 wild horses, requires 6,600 AUMs per year.  The current stocking rate is one wild horse per thousand acres, in line with the target rate across all HMAs (27,000 animals on 27 million acres).

The HMA intersects four grazing allotments.  Table 4 in Section 3.2.2 provides data on allotment size, authorized AUMs and grazing seasons.

The total estimated forage available to livestock inside the HMA is the sum of the forage contributions of each allotment.  For example, 38% of the Alvord allotment lies within the HMA so it contributes 38% of its forage to the HMA, assuming the resource is evenly distributed across the parcel (.38 × 7,355 = 2,795 AUMs per year).  The total estimated forage for livestock across the four allotments is 13,421 AUMs per year.

Coyote Lake Calcs-1

The allotment acreage inside the HMA is computed the same way.  The total is less than the size of the HMA, suggesting that some of the HMA, about 21%, is not subject to permitted grazing.  The map in Appendix B does not show the allotment boundaries.

Livestock populations and stocking rates are based on cow/calf pairs, as their resource requirements are said to be equivalent to those of wild horses.

The Alvord ranchers would have to place 399 cow/calf pairs inside the HMA to graze off 2,795 AUMs in seven months (2,795 ÷ 7 = 399).  The total estimated number of cow/calf pairs inside the HMA is 2,384, for a weighted average grazing season of 5.6 months.

The stocking rate allowed by plan is therefore 2,384 ÷ 441,841 × 1,000 = 5.4 cow/calf pairs per thousand acres.  The stocking rates on individual allotments range from 4.2 to 12.1 cow/calf pairs per thousand acres.

These management indicators are compared in the following charts.

Coyote Lake Charts-1

These are the goals of the Proposed Action, to be achieved by roundups and maintained by “intensive fertility control”—in an area set aside for wild horses.

The forage assigned to livestock would support an additional 1,118 wild horses (13,421 ÷ 12), for a new AML of 1,508 (390 + 1,118).  These figures are lower than those estimated above by the Rule of Four and Rule of Five.  The rules might work best on HMAs that are 100% subject to permitted livestock grazing.

Although the HMA is 40% over AML, the current population is well within the carrying capacity of the land (550 < 1,508).

The problem is public-lands ranching, not wild horse overpopulation.

RELATED: Barren Valley Gather EA Comes and Goes, No News Release.

PSA 12-15-19

Mustang Monument: Pricey Is an Understatement

Cost per night is $2,650, double occupancy, according to an article published today by Forbes.  Keep in mind it’s a travel column, not a wild horse column.

Madeleine Pickens purchased base properties in eastern Nevada, giving her grazing preference to hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands, on which she would place 30,000 wild horses rescued from government pens.

At first the BLM supported the idea but later opposed it.  Refer to this report by KLAS News for some background on the project.

RELATED: Intrigue at Spruce-Pequop HMA.

Oregon Wild Horse Group Sues Crook County Commission

The Central Oregon Wild Horse Coalition has sued the Crook County Commission for holding a series of meetings in May to comment on proposed changes to the Big Summit Wild Horse Management Plan without giving proper notification of the meetings, according to a brief published this morning by Courthouse News Service.

Commissioners sent a letter to the Forest Service advocating for Alternative 2 in the EA, which would reduce the AML on the WHT, arguing that the other two alternatives would allow a “downward trend … in forage availability,” leading to a “significant reduction or exclusion of wildlife and permitted livestock grazing from the Territory.”

The three-page letter, dated May 14, appears as Exhibit 1 at the end of the court filing.

RELATED: Comments Invited on Changes to Big Summit Management Plan.

Range Creek Roundup Over?

The daily reports ended July 6, with 148 wild horses removed from their home range.

No deaths were reported.

The number of horses removed was about 18% higher than originally planned.

The number of foals captured on July 3 was not given.  If you deduct that day’s results from the total, foals represented about 22% of the horses captured.

Body condition scores were threes and fours, not what you’d expect for an area that’s overpopulated.

RELATED: Range Creek Roundup Starts Next Week.

Montana Grazing Fees

A draft environmental assessment for livestock grazing on the Pumpkin Creek allotment shows average grazing fees of $12.92 per AUM on state-owned lands and $26.50 per AUM on private lands.  See page 26 in the EA (page 30 in the pdf).

The fee on BLM lands is $1.35 per AUM, about 5% of the going rate on private lands.

The government pays about $60 per AUM for wild horses in long-term holding.

The allotment is about 15 miles south of Miles City in the eastern part of the state, according to a news release issued yesterday.

No More Overflowing Tanks

The fill valves hang over the rims of the tanks but the mustangs can flip them out of the water, as seen in this video, wasting a critical resource.

They are now held in place by wood blocks that were attached to the rims with carriage bolts and wing nuts.

In case you did not know, the eleventh commandment on the high desert is “Thou shalt not put thy well to the test.”  You don’t buy land in this area with visions of high-tech irrigation systems and lush green lawns!

No More Overflowing Tanks

Review of New WH Population Control Plan Almost Complete?

The plan was issued on May 8.  Congress had sixty days to review it.  That period ends tomorrow.  Legislators authorized $21 million in FY 2020 to implement the first part of the rancher-friendly ‘Path Forward’ but only after the BLM “submits a comprehensive and detailed plan for an aggressive, non-lethal population control strategy.”

RELATED: Strategy for Implementing ‘Path Forward’ Sent to Congress.

AEA Pushes WH Darting Machine

Another press release appeared last week, provided by American Equine Awareness, touting the benefits of the contraption, which can deliver contraceptives to free-roaming horses without human involvement, except to restock the bait and pesticides.

Whose side are they on?

These animals are being forced off their home range because most of their food has been sold to public-lands ranchers, not because they’re overpopulated.

Those who want herd sizes reduced, by roundups, fertility control or any other method, are allies of the ranchers.  Don’t give them a penny!

RELATED: Who Invented the Wild Horse Darting Machine?

PSA 12-07-19

Stop the [Causes of] Roundups!

If you read environmental assessments for management actions on HMAs, you may have seen statements like this:

The elimination of livestock grazing in an area would require an amendment to the RMP.  Changes to grazing cannot be made through a wild horse gather decision.

Roundups, fertility control, sex ratio skewing and sterilization are products of a decision making process that determines the use of public lands.

Those decisions are influenced by other standards, such as the No Rancher Left Behind Act of 1976, as well as the beliefs and loyalties of those involved.

Adoptions, training programs and sanctuaries are too far downstream in the process to be of any use to the horses and burros still on the range.

They are symptoms, not causes.

How far upstream in the process would you have to go to bring about the desired change?  How often do Resource Management Plans come up for review?  What type of safeguards are protecting them?

RELATED: Stop the Roundups, Fertility Control is Better!

Thriving Ecological Balance-3