Sulphur Roundup in the Works?

A project appears in BLM’s NEPA register (sometimes referred to as ‘ePlanning’) but no documents have been posted.

There are three levels of analysis in the NEPA process: Categorical Exclusion (CX), Environmental Assessment (EA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).  Wild horse management actions often fall into the middle category but major changes, such as the Rock Springs RMP Amendments, require an EIS.

A project involving wild horses and burros may begin with a scoping request, to receive input from the public, followed by staff work to formulate an action plan and draft an environmental assessment.  The EA looks at the consequences of a preferred action and one or more alternatives.

The preliminary plan and EA are posted for public review and may be revised in light of substantive comments.

If there are no major issues, a decision record and finding of no significant impact may be is issued, allowing the plan to go forward.  This does not mean the roundup starts the following week!  There are priorities and funding is not unlimited.  The plan may face legal challenges.

The process can take several years to complete although it may be shortened or bypassed altogether in the case of emergencies.

The Sulphur HMA is in western Utah on the Nevada border.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s