Refer to this story, published yesterday by Yahoo Finance.
The problem is public-lands ranching, yet these so-called advocates agree in principle with their opponents, differing only in methodology.
Why aren’t they challenging the constitutionality of FLPMA, which gave the federal government control over vast amounts of western rangelands and preferential treatment to the ranchers?
Why aren’t they pushing for an increase in grazing fees to $60 per AUM, in line with the cost of feeding wild horses in long-term pastures?
Why aren’t they demanding labels on beef, so consumers would know if the item was produced at the expense of America’s wild horses and burros?
RELATED: Co-Signers of WHB Management Plan Try to Save Face.
