If you’re a numbers guy, this article in NorCal Fishing News, dated 08/26/18, will make you smile. (Not sure how it got into a fishing report, might be a reprint of figures published elsewhere.)
The video below shows some vegetation on the side of a road in the Virginia Range near sunset on 08/24/18.
You might think somebody took a sickle to that brush but the work was done by wild horses. Remaining stalks are about six inches tall, no trimmings to clean up. It’s nature’s fire control regimen.
See also this story in Markets Insider dated 08/23/18.
The article also stated that the BLM typically allows eight cow/calf pairs per square mile, equivalent to eight wild horses per square mile. That yields a stocking rate for livestock of 12.5 animals per thousand acres, compared to an aimed-at population density of one animal per thousand acres for horses on BLM lands.
Who benefits from this arrangement? Is this what Congress intended on lands set aside for wild horses and burros or is it a twisting and stretching of ‘multiple use’ by the BLM, on behalf of the livestock industry? Is this the meaning of ‘thriving ecological balance?’
The figures at the end of the article hint at the idea of replacing AMLs with pie charts that show how resources are allocated among consumers on HMAs.