Horses have the day off.  At the Black Mountain HMA with Shifting Gears 2 RV Life.

A story by Aspen Daily News says BLM employee Jace Stott pulled the trigger.

A profile on LinkedIn suggests he’s a Rangeland Management Specialist, sometimes referred to as ranching advocate.

Other search results indicate he was affiliated with University of Nebraska – Lincoln and has been involved with animal agriculture from a very young age.

The article is the first of a two-part series that explores wild horse management.

RELATED: BLM Dispatches Pryor Stallion, Advocates Cry Foul.

If you want to compare the resource loading of burros to horses, cut the burro numbers in half.

A herd of 200 burros is equivalent to 100 wild horses.

An AML of 50 burros is equivalent to an AML 25 wild horses.

An allotment that supports livestock equivalent to 1,200 wild horses supports livestock equivalent to 2,400 wild burros.

An allotment that supports livestock equivalent to 5.6 wild horses per thousand public acres supports livestock equivalent to 11.2 wild burros per thousand public acres.

An allotment that offers 3,600 AUMs per year to livestock offers 3,600 AUMs per year to horses or 3,600 AUMs per year to burros.

RELATED: Equivalent Horses and Stocking Rates for Allotments.

They went back on the job this week with the burial of Private Bernard Curran who died in 1942 after being captured by the Japanese.

The horses have pulled the flag-draped coffins of America’s war heroes to their final resting place at Arlington National Cemetery for more than 70 years according to a report by Fox News.

The program was halted two years ago after the Army linked the deaths of several animals to poor living conditions.

RELATED: Return of Caisson Platoon Delayed Indefinitely?

One of the challengers to the Salt River Wild Horse Darting Group said in a story by the Payson Roundup that “…horses receiving multiple doses of PZP over the course of several years can become functionally sterile,” a condition nobody wanted to talk about until today.

The group’s ringleader claimed responsibility for herd reduction via mass sterilization, ratifying a June 2 commentary by Western Horse Watchers: “We invented this humane management protocol…”

No foals have been born this year according to the report.

RELATED: Who Would Want to Be Responsible for Salt River Herd?

In the introduction to a 2012 Q&A about PZP, Jay Kirkpatrick of the Billings School of PZP Darting and Public Deception stated that “…oversight by The Humane Society of the United States assures that the vaccine is used only to slow reproduction and may not be used for the extermination of entire herds.”

Further, “PZP is designed to bring about short-term infertility and is reversible, if not used beyond five consecutive years.”

On page 29 he refutes the remarks on page 3: “The HSUS will permit the use of PZP to manage, even reduce, but not to eliminate wild horses.”

Writing about the disaster at Assateague Island, which he did not live to see, “the first sign of population reduction took about eight years, but herd reduction has been moving more quickly since then.  The following eight years, herd numbers went down from 175 to 114, without any removal of horses, treating anywhere from 48% to 79% annually.”

If a helicopter took the herd from 175 to 114, 61 horses would be removed and the advocates would be howling, but if it’s done with pesticides, no horses are removed.

Moreover, the job took eight years to complete and eight is greater than five, so most of the mares had been ruined by the time the population hit 114.

This is evident today.

You cannot shrink a population without driving the birth rate to zero, or nearly so, for an extended period, which usually exceeds five years.

Herd reduction leads to sterilization and sterilization leads to extermination, which the Humane Society won’t allow, supposedly.

NOTE: HSUS is now HWA.

RELATED: Foal-Free Friday, One Track Mind Edition.

The Arizona Department of Agriculture will reopen the RFP soon according to a story by Phoenix New Times but a date was not given.

The article looks at the incumbent and one of its challengers, a group led by historian John Mack and Forest Service contractor Jacquelyn Hughes.

Hughes was involved in the removal of wild horses from the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in 2022.

Simone Netherlands of the Salt River Wild Horse Darting Group suspects the contract will go to the group that proposes the smallest population goal.

That will raise questions in some circles about genetic diversity but the point is moot when most of the mares have ruined by PZP.

RELATED: Salt River RFP Cancelled.

Those who would combat myths about wild horses are often the greatest spreaders thereof.

Genetic viability correlates with breeding populations, not AMLs or herd sizes.

You have to correct the figures for the number of mares that have been ruined or are in the process of being ruined with fertility control pesticides.

For example, the current population at the Salt River is approximately 260 and most advocates would conclude that genetic diversity is satisfactory when in fact most of the mares have been sterilized by PZP and the breeding population can be counted on one hand.

As for carrying capacity, if a wild horse area is subject to permitted grazing, which is almost always the case, the AML is small relative to the available resources and the land can support many more animals than the bureaucrats admit.

The Silver King HMA in eastern Nevada supports livestock equivalent to 2,530 wild horses, on top of the 128 allowed by plan.

A herd that large is not safe from the advocates.

Volunteers with the Campaign Against America’s Wild horses are wiping out the Virginia Range mustangs with PZP, a population that exceeded 3,000.

Wild horses usually don’t fight to the finish but that’s what the advocates concluded according to a report by WITN News.

The loss is especially troubling because most of the mares have been ruined with PZP and the death rate now exceeds the birth rate.

Clover Mountain and Pine Nut Mountains were added to the June 3 update.

Chloride, Four Mile and Bible Spring were added in May.

No change to the bottom-line totals.

RELATED: Nuisance Roundups Increase in Latest Schedule.

Horses have the day off.  In the Hickison HMA with DebraElaine McDonald.

From the project description in ePlanning:

The Wolf Creek allotment would contain 8,253 acres of BLM administered land, 2,712 deeded acres and 640 acres of state lands.  The BLM administered acreage would have 1,242 AUMs of active use, equivalent to 103 wild horses or 12.5 wild horses per thousand public acres.

Your faithful public servants insist the public lands in the western U.S. can only support one wild horse per thousand acres (25,500 animals on 25.6 million acres).

The Square Butte allotment would contain 5,039 acres of BLM administered land, 2,280 deeded acres and 663 acres of state lands.  The BLM administered acreage would have 754 AUMs of active use, equivalent to 63 wild horses or 12.5 wild horses per thousand public acres.

The Ely allotment would contain 1,563 acres of BLM administered land and 480 deeded acres.  The BLM administered acreage would have 326 AUMs of active use equivalent to 27 wild horses or 17.4 wild horses per thousand public acres.

The 7-W allotment would contain 6,201 acres of BLM administered land, 6,729 deeded acres and 640 acres of state lands.  The BLM administered acreage would have 1,430 AUMs of active use, equivalent to 119 wild horses or 19.2 wild horses per thousand public acres.

The Six-X allotment would contain 10,327 acres of BLM administered land, 8,978 deeded acres and 1,920 acres of state lands.  The BLM administered acreage would have 2,125 AUMs of active use, equivalent to 177 wild horses or 17.1 wild horses per thousand public acres.

The D.K. North Pasture allotment would contain 4,470 acres of BLM administered land, 13,686 deeded acres, and 640 acres of state lands.  The BLM administered acreage would have 758 AUMS of authorized active use, equivalent to 63 wild horses or 14.1 wild horses per thousand public acres.

The advocates don’t want you looking at the numbers because they contradict their allies, expose the gravy train and destroy the rationale for their darting programs.

RELATED: Montana Allotment Split Reveals Abundant Forage.